While we are distracted with healthcare …
by GunRights4USMarch 19, 2010
Read about it at BigGovernment.com
I never imagined in my wildest dreams that America would fall into tyranny. Clearly the Constitution has utterly failed since it should be obvious to anyone that it provides NO RESTRAINT whatsoever on the politicians that are fleecing the American people. Virtually every single one of them on Capitol Hill have dishonored their oath and should treated as TRAITORS!
They are systematically destroying the Republic! Can anyone deny this?
Some excellent points on the coming chaos
by GunRights4USMarch 18, 2010
You know what's funny? Funny as in weird not funny, hah ha.And then an anonymous commenter replies:
Here we are on the verge of a civil war and because the news media does not even recognize the validity of our grievances,and certainly never reports them, nobody thinks it is coming except the people preparing for it.
They know damn well what the polls say - long before WE do. They have folks who do NOTHING else but watch such things.
They know damn well how angry we are.
They know they're going to suffer an electoral bloodbath in '10 and '12 - if not a literal one before.
They.
Do.
Not.
CARE.
In fact, I believe they're *HOPING* for all of the above.
They're hoping for a revolt - because it will give them excuse to implement martial law and do whatever they please - as in "The Day the Dollar Died".
Failing that, they're hoping for a currency or other collapse - for the exact same reason.
Failing both - by some miracle - they hope to lose enough seats in '10 to give the Stupid-party 50-50 "ownership" of the inevitable economic HELL that's coming. If it turns around before '12 they'll claim credit, if not they'll blame the Retardlicans.
Either way, they'll have jammed through their socialist agenda which will never be repealed, and they'll build on it when the pendulum swings again.
Either way, they'll have paid off their Union Masters, and stalled the total collapse of Medicare/SS just long enough for the Retardlicans to take the blame.
It's actually brilliant in a sick, sad way.
Though it pains me to say it, I've come to HOPE for a real, bloody revolution - it's the only way we'll ever get to RESTORATION.
As to failing "to think our way around the media blackout" -- I don't believe it matters. I live in a very rural area - among a lot of folk who "don't see no use for that there internet stuff" - and just today I heard some older men say "I ain't too old to tote my rifle one more time..."
Many, many, MANY people don't need to read Sipsey Street to see what time it is.
When the time comes, we'll have the usual ~20% of the population behind us, and ~45% arrayed AGAINST us. Thankfully the latter doesn't own firearms because they're askeered of 'em.
Even WITHOUT the Marxists currently in power, we're approaching 1/2 of the people in our nation who look forward to living on the .gov's teat - even if it's the HIND one it beats having to hunt and gather. Further, they all know we're a threat to their "free" rice-bowl - especially the majority of whom agree 110% with their Marxist/socialist ideals.
This to me is the reason civil war is inevitable: roughly 1/2 the population is reasonably conservative, the other 1/2 is well left of center, and we've FINALLY realized that being "nice" and "civil" only means forfeiting ground again and again and again - thus slowing but never stopping the incremental march to a fully socialist state.
Every single "compromise" moves us further away from where WE want to be - and we're finally done giving in.
OTOH, the Commu-sociacrats are even LESS willing to budge, and have finally stopped even PRETENDING.
Two UTTERLY opposite world-views held by nearly equal numbers, and both sides unwilling to budge. Does it happen NOW (in this Administration) or do we wait and let THEM start it after the next Retardlican majority?
As with any painful, bloody procedure, it's only going to be worse the longer we wait - plus it gives The Enemy longer to get a clue and start in with the weapons and ammo buying and training.
It'll never get any easier.
Some excellent points on the coming chaos
by GunRights4USMarch 18, 2010
You know what's funny? Funny as in weird not funny, hah ha.And then an anonymous commenter replies:
Here we are on the verge of a civil war and because the news media does not even recognize the validity of our grievances,and certainly never reports them, nobody thinks it is coming except the people preparing for it.
They know damn well what the polls say - long before WE do. They have folks who do NOTHING else but watch such things.
They know damn well how angry we are.
They know they're going to suffer an electoral bloodbath in '10 and '12 - if not a literal one before.
They.
Do.
Not.
CARE.
In fact, I believe they're *HOPING* for all of the above.
They're hoping for a revolt - because it will give them excuse to implement martial law and do whatever they please - as in "The Day the Dollar Died".
Failing that, they're hoping for a currency or other collapse - for the exact same reason.
Failing both - by some miracle - they hope to lose enough seats in '10 to give the Stupid-party 50-50 "ownership" of the inevitable economic HELL that's coming. If it turns around before '12 they'll claim credit, if not they'll blame the Retardlicans.
Either way, they'll have jammed through their socialist agenda which will never be repealed, and they'll build on it when the pendulum swings again.
Either way, they'll have paid off their Union Masters, and stalled the total collapse of Medicare/SS just long enough for the Retardlicans to take the blame.
It's actually brilliant in a sick, sad way.
Though it pains me to say it, I've come to HOPE for a real, bloody revolution - it's the only way we'll ever get to RESTORATION.
As to failing "to think our way around the media blackout" -- I don't believe it matters. I live in a very rural area - among a lot of folk who "don't see no use for that there internet stuff" - and just today I heard some older men say "I ain't too old to tote my rifle one more time..."
Many, many, MANY people don't need to read Sipsey Street to see what time it is.
When the time comes, we'll have the usual ~20% of the population behind us, and ~45% arrayed AGAINST us. Thankfully the latter doesn't own firearms because they're askeered of 'em.
Even WITHOUT the Marxists currently in power, we're approaching 1/2 of the people in our nation who look forward to living on the .gov's teat - even if it's the HIND one it beats having to hunt and gather. Further, they all know we're a threat to their "free" rice-bowl - especially the majority of whom agree 110% with their Marxist/socialist ideals.
This to me is the reason civil war is inevitable: roughly 1/2 the population is reasonably conservative, the other 1/2 is well left of center, and we've FINALLY realized that being "nice" and "civil" only means forfeiting ground again and again and again - thus slowing but never stopping the incremental march to a fully socialist state.
Every single "compromise" moves us further away from where WE want to be - and we're finally done giving in.
OTOH, the Commu-sociacrats are even LESS willing to budge, and have finally stopped even PRETENDING.
Two UTTERLY opposite world-views held by nearly equal numbers, and both sides unwilling to budge. Does it happen NOW (in this Administration) or do we wait and let THEM start it after the next Retardlican majority?
As with any painful, bloody procedure, it's only going to be worse the longer we wait - plus it gives The Enemy longer to get a clue and start in with the weapons and ammo buying and training.
It'll never get any easier.
Stealing Your Retirement No More Miranda and Fishing Illegal in America
by Greg FarberMarch 9, 2010
I guess the people of this nation are gonna lay down and take it..
A little party history lesson, equates to socialist communism in America
by Greg FarberMarch 9, 2010
What is the purpose of the several secretive and semi secretive groups in the world today. You know these groups exist so why be in denial of their existence. Lets call them organizations. Why do some of these organizations select and then support the candidates for major political offices. Like the Council on Foreign Relations consistently presenting U.S. Corporate presidential candidates who eventually become their president. Not your president, their president.
Perhaps the best answer to the question has been answered already by Norman Thomas, the Socialist Party’s presidential candidate in every national election between the years 1928 to 1948. Mr. Thomas said : “We have learned that it is possible, to a degree not anticipated by most earlier Socialists, to impose desirable social controls on privately owned enterprises by the development of social planning, by proper taxation and labor legislation and by the growth of powerful labor organizations.”
Mr. Thomas was revealing the game plan for the ultimate success of Socialism ; the utilization of non-socialist hands to gradually achieve the goals of Socialism. The question was how could the Socialists get the American people to accept Socialism when the American people had made it clear through the years they didn’t want the economic philosphy known as Socialism.
Mr. Thomas answered this question on another occasion ; ” The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism, but under the name of Liberalism, they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program until one day America will be a Socialist nation without knowing how it happened. ”
The key to success for the Socialists was to get the American people to support candidates that they perceived were “anti-socialist” but were in truth supporting the cause of the Socialist Party in increasing the size and scope of government in the lives of the American people.
Mr. Thomas later identified one of these Liberal closet Socialists when he wrote, : the United States is making greater strides toward Socialism under President Eisenhower than under President Franklin Roosevelt. There are many who considered Roosevelt to be a semi-Socialist, but Eisenhower has been perceived as a “conservative” by the American people. Yet Thomas told the American people that Eisenhower as President was doing more to promote Socialism than had Roosevelt as President.
Another individual hiding his socialism, according to Norman Thomas, was President Lyndon Johnson. Thomas was pleased with Johnson’s Great Society : ” I ought to rejoice and I do. I rub my eyes in amazement and surprise. His war on poverty is a Socialist approach.. Thomas also heaped praise upon another ” closet ” Socialist, Hubert Humphrey, who ” is the type of Democrat I like and one who would be a Socialist if he got to England.”
Another so-called ” Conservative anti-Socialist” President was President Richard Nixon. But John Kenneth Galbreath, the Paul Warburg Professor of Economics at Harvard University, identified him as a ” closet ” socialist, one doing the work of the Socialist party. First, Professor Galbreath presented his credentials that enabled him to determine if anyone else was a Socialist. He made a statement that indicated that he personally was a Socialist. He advocated that ….” a certain number of industries should be publically owned. For moving and housing people at moderate cost, private enterprise does not serve.”
Then he makes the connection between Socialism and President Nixon : ” But I had come reluctantly to the conclusion that Socialism, even in this modest design, was something I would never see. Now I am being rescued by this new Socialist upsurge, promoted, of all things, by socialists. not on the Left, but on the Right, and they have the blessing and conceivably much more, of a Republican Administration. Certainly, the least predicted development under the Nixon administration was the great new thrust to Socialism. As an opponent of Socialism, Mr. Nixon seemed steadfast.”
What these people were saying was that it didn’t make any difference whether the American people voted Republican and ” anti-Socialist,” or Democratic and “Liberal,” they get the same thing, more Socialism. This statement becomes graphically clear when the following issues are examined in light of what the two major political parties have done in support of them. Both parties have at one time or another supported ;
1. Ratification of the Genocide Convention.
2. A guaranteed annual income.
3. Federal Minimum Wage Legislation.
4. Federal Food Stamp program.
5. Abolition of the death penalty.
6. Peaceful Coexistence.
7. Socialized medicine.
8. Disarmament.
9. Repeal of the Internal Security Legislation aimed at Communism.
10. Federal Civil Rights Legislation.
11. Reapportionment of Electoral Districts on the basis of Population.
12. Federal Aid to Education. ( Indoctrination).
13. Federal Child Care Centers.
14. Ratification of the 1963 Nuclear Test Ban Treaty.
15. Termination of American sovereignty in the Panama Canal Zone.
16. Increased agricultural and commercial trade with the communist nations.
Not only have either or both of the major political parties supported these programs, but another party has as well. In fact, these are some of the planks in the official platforms of the Communist Party, U.S.A.
No American gulags you say ? I beg to differ
by Greg FarberMarch 5, 2010
If you was stealing everything a people owned, and they became angry at you, and possibly decided to come remove you from their midst and take back what you had stolen from them, would this not be a great emergency ?
HR 645 IH
111th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 645
To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish national emergency centers on military installations.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 22, 2009
Mr. HASTINGS of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
A BILL
To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish national emergency centers on military installations.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘National Emergency Centers Establishment Act’.
SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL EMERGENCY CENTERS.
(a) In General- In accordance with the requirements of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall establish not fewer than 6 national emergency centers on military installations.
(b) Purpose of National Emergency Centers- The purpose of a national emergency center shall be to use existing infrastructure–
(1) to provide temporary housing, medical, and humanitarian assistance to individuals and families dislocated due to an emergency or major disaster;
(2) to provide centralized locations for the purposes of training and ensuring the coordination of Federal, State, and local first responders;
(3) to provide centralized locations to improve the coordination of preparedness, response, and recovery efforts of government, private, and not-for-profit entities and faith-based organizations; and
(4) to meet other appropriate needs, as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security.
SEC. 3. DESIGNATION OF MILITARY INSTALLATIONS AS NATIONAL EMERGENCY CENTERS.
(a) In General- Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall designate not fewer than 6 military installations as sites for the establishment of national emergency centers.
(b) Minimum Requirements- A site designated as a national emergency center shall be–
(1) capable of meeting for an extended period of time the housing, health, transportation, education, public works, humanitarian and other transition needs of a large number of individuals affected by an emergency or major disaster;
(2) environmentally safe and shall not pose a health risk to individuals who may use the center;
(3) capable of being scaled up or down to accommodate major disaster preparedness and response drills, operations, and procedures;
(4) capable of housing existing permanent structures necessary to meet training and first responders coordination requirements during nondisaster periods;
(5) capable of hosting the infrastructure necessary to rapidly adjust to temporary housing, medical, and humanitarian assistance needs;
(6) required to consist of a complete operations command center, including 2 state-of-the art command and control centers that will comprise a 24/7 operations watch center as follows:
(A) one of the command and control centers shall be in full ready mode; and
(B) the other shall be used daily for training; and
(7) easily accessible at all times and be able to facilitate handicapped and medical facilities, including during an emergency or major disaster.
(c) Location of National Emergency Centers- There shall be established not fewer than one national emergency center in each of the following areas:
(1) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Regions I, II, and III.
(2) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Region IV.
(3) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Regions V and VII.
(4) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Region VI.
(5) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Regions VIII and X.
(6) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Region IX.
(d) Preference for Designation of Closed Military Installations- Wherever possible, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall designate a closed military installation as a site for a national emergency center. If the Secretaries of Homeland Security and Defense jointly determine that there is not a sufficient number of closed military installations that meet the requirements of subsections (b) and (c), the Secretaries shall jointly designate portions of existing military installations other than closed military installations as national emergency centers.
(e) Transfer of Control of Closed Military Installations- If a closed military installation is designated as a national emergency center, not later than 180 days after the date of designation, the Secretary of Defense shall transfer to the Secretary of Homeland Security administrative jurisdiction over such closed military installation.
(f) Cooperative Agreement for Joint Use of Existing Military Installations- If an existing military installation other than a closed military installation is designated as a national emergency center, not later than 180 days after the date of designation, the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Secretary of Defense shall enter into a cooperative agreement to provide for the establishment of the national emergency center.
(g) Reports-
(1) PRELIMINARY REPORT- Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting jointly with the Secretary of Defense, shall submit to Congress a report that contains for each designated site–
(A) an outline of the reasons why the site was selected;
(B) an outline of the need to construct, repair, or update any existing infrastructure at the site;
(C) an outline of the need to conduct any necessary environmental clean-up at the site;
(D) an outline of preliminary plans for the transfer of control of the site from the Secretary of Defense to the Secretary of Homeland Security, if necessary under subsection (e); and
(E) an outline of preliminary plans for entering into a cooperative agreement for the establishment of a national emergency center at the site, if necessary under subsection (f).
(2) UPDATE REPORT- Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting jointly with the Secretary of Defense, shall submit to Congress a report that contains for each designated site–
(A) an update on the information contained in the report as required by paragraph (1);
(B) an outline of the progress made toward the transfer of control of the site, if necessary under subsection (e);
(C) an outline of the progress made toward entering a cooperative agreement for the establishment of a national emergency center at the site, if necessary under subsection (f); and
(D) recommendations regarding any authorizations and appropriations that may be necessary to provide for the establishment of a national emergency center at the site.
(3) FINAL REPORT- Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting jointly with the Secretary of Defense, shall submit to Congress a report that contains for each designated site–
(A) finalized information detailing the transfer of control of the site, if necessary under subsection (e);
(B) the finalized cooperative agreement for the establishment of a national emergency center at the site, if necessary under subsection (f); and
(C) any additional information pertinent to the establishment of a national emergency center at the site.
(4) ADDITIONAL REPORTS- The Secretary of Homeland Security, acting jointly with the Secretary of Defense, may submit to Congress additional reports as necessary to provide updates on steps being taken to meet the requirements of this Act.
SEC. 4. LIMITATIONS ON STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION.
This Act does not affect–
(1) the authority of the Federal Government to provide emergency or major disaster assistance or to implement any disaster mitigation and response program, including any program authorized by the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.); or
(2) the authority of a State or local government to respond to an emergency.
SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.
There is authorized to be appropriated $180,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2009 and 2010 to carry out this Act. Such funds shall remain available until expended.
SEC. 6. DEFINITIONS.
In this Act, the following definitions apply:
(1) CLOSED MILITARY INSTALLATION- The term ‘closed military installation’ means a military installation, or portion thereof, approved for closure or realignment under the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) that meet all, or 2 out of the 3 following requirements:
(A) Is located in close proximity to a transportation corridor.
(B) Is located in a State with a high level or threat of disaster related activities.
(C) Is located near a major metropolitan center.
(2) EMERGENCY- The term ‘emergency’ has the meaning given such term in section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122).
(3) MAJOR DISASTER- The term ‘major disaster’ has the meaning given such term in section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122).
(4) MILITARY INSTALLATION- The term ‘military installation’ has the meaning given such term in section 2910 of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note).
Where America is heading if we don’t change paths
by GunRights4USMarch 3, 2010
When George Orwell wrote 1984, he probably never imagined that society would actually become that oppressive. Yet in some nations of the world it has. In fact, in nations such as the U.K., "Big Brother" controls have now been implemented that are so bizarre that Orwell could not have possibly envisioned them during the time in which he lived. The truth is that the U.K. has become a society run by elitist control freaks. The most intimate and personal details of the lives of millions of people in the U.K. are tightly monitored and controlled by a ruthless technocracy that would have been unimaginable just a few decades ago. The following are 20 signs that the U.K. has now become the most oppressive Big Brother society on earth.....
#1) The U.K. has more surveillance cameras per citizen than anywhere else in the world. In fact, according to one estimate, there are 4.8 million video cameras constantly watching every move citizens make.
#2) Government education inspectors in the U.K. have announced that the 40,000 parents who homeschool their own children must undergo criminal records checks.
#3) U.K. authorities are now admitting that every phone call, text message, email and website visit made by private citizens will be stored for one year and will be available for monitoring by government agencies.
#4) Officials in the U.K. have spent two years and massive amounts of money on a study they claim proves that 10-pin bowling is a health and safety hazard and should be banned.
#5) Parents at one school in the U.K. are being forced to undergo background checks to prove that they are not pedophiles before they are allowed to accompany their children to school Christmas carol events.
#6) A U.K. Parliamentary briefing note published in November 2009 maintains that the U.K. government has the power to impose nationwide mandatory swine flu vaccinations under the Civil Contingencies Act of 2004.
#7) Thousands of "dysfunctional" families in the U.K. are being subjected to intensive 24-hour surveillance to make sure that their children attend school, go to bed on time and eat proper meals. About 2,000 families have already gone through these "Family Intervention Projects", and the U.K. government plans to increase the scope of this program to 20,000 more families over the next two years.
#8 ) A controversial new proposal in the U.K. would force political parties to make Parliament less white, male, middle-class and heterosexual.
#9) The U.K.'s new Internet law includes a "three strikes" rule that allows your entire family to be cut off from the Internet if anyone who lives in your house is accused of copyright infringement - without proof or evidence or trial.
#10) The U.K. government's obsession with collecting personal data has now extended to 5 year olds, as local Community Health Services are preparing to get parents to reveal the most intimate details of their child’s personal, behavioral and eating habits.
#11) The U.K. government is going to make sure that their citizens are "environmentally friendly" whether they like it or not. Under a new government plan, energy experts in the U.K. are going to visit every home in the country in order to "help them go green". As part of "The Great British Refurb", teams of "energy advisers" will go "house by house, street by street" to tell people what they must do in order to become eco-friendly.
#12) The U.K. has become absolutely obsessed with garbage, with huge fines imposed on those who do not dispose of their trash in the prescribed manner.
#13) The head of the Environment Agency in the U.K. believes that implementing individual carbon allowances for each citizen will be the most effective way of meeting the targets for cutting greenhouse gas emissions.
#14) In an almost inconceivable move, personal checks are to be abolished under controversial plans being drawn up by U.K. bankers.
#15) It is now illegal to photograph the police in the U.K.
#16) In the U.K., the study of evolution is to become a compulsory subject in all state primary schools.
#17) The U.K. government is being forced by the European Commission to eliminate exemptions that allow churches to refuse to employ homosexual staff.
#18 ) Parents in the U.K. are about to lose the right to withdraw their child from sex education classes when the child reaches 15 years of age.
#19) One mother in the U.K. was trailed by a policeman and formally warned by a local council for telling off her son at a checkout counter.
#20) The U.K. is in the process of implementing a "National Identity Card" which will be able to hold fifty different categories of information on each U.K. citizen, including digital facial scans, digital iris scans and up to 10 fingerprints.
Another Socialist Insecurity Scam by FDR Obama two..
by Greg FarberFebruary 28, 2010
Laugh my ass off, now the government, via Obama and his crew, are going to attach our paychecks for a special savings account for the “country” because you and I can not manage our own money.. We need the government to help us to save.. Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha…. Fck me to tears.
No wonder these cretins are scared of “assault” guns.. They can’t stop assaulting our funds, you know stealing from us, their going to take it all folks, their kleptomaniacs.
Four easy steps to a government takeover of healthcare
by GunRights4USFebruary 24, 2010
1. Pass a law to require insurance companies to accept everyone, regardless of ‘pre-existing” medical conditions. This will be very popular with the public, especially those of us like my wife and I with chronic diseases.
2. Pass a law allowing the government to control insurance rate increases, then grant very few increases. This will be popular with everyone—who wants to pay more for health insurance? Except, of course, the insurance industry, already operating at a profit margin of only 2%, according to an AP report.
3. The insurance companies, faced with vastly increased expenditures, and little increased revenue, go bankrupt.
4. The public, faced with a loss of insurance coverage, demands the government take over the insurance industry to provide coverage. Health insurance is declared “too big too fail.”
The government now controls health care, one-sixth of our economy, along with a lot of banks and car companies. It can pass laws to protect it’s investment and the legions of new unionized government workers, who contribute and vote for the party that guarantees their incomes.
And there we have it — Socialism in our time.
PT1 Michael Shaw AGENDA 21 Depopulation on Freedomizer Radio.wmv
by Greg FarberFebruary 22, 2010
Agenda 21, Sustainable Development, Smart Growth, is the Soviet Socialist New Age model, including Eugenics, population control, and total control measures 100% Anti Declaration of Independence.. This ties into Climate Control, Gun Control, Anti hunting, pro predators.. Ghia and Pantheism worship..
