Was there ever any doubt?
by GunRights4USMarch 21, 2010
Ladies and gentlemen... the DIS honorable Alcee Hastings D-Fla
And for anyone who claims this was simply taken out of context, go here and see all of Hasting's remarks - starting at 4:44.
They’re claiming sufficient votes to pass
by GunRights4USMarch 21, 2010
They’re claiming sufficient votes to pass
by GunRights4USMarch 21, 2010
While we are distracted with healthcare …
by GunRights4USMarch 19, 2010
Read about it at BigGovernment.com
I never imagined in my wildest dreams that America would fall into tyranny. Clearly the Constitution has utterly failed since it should be obvious to anyone that it provides NO RESTRAINT whatsoever on the politicians that are fleecing the American people. Virtually every single one of them on Capitol Hill have dishonored their oath and should treated as TRAITORS!
They are systematically destroying the Republic! Can anyone deny this?
Some excellent points on the coming chaos
by GunRights4USMarch 18, 2010
You know what's funny? Funny as in weird not funny, hah ha.And then an anonymous commenter replies:
Here we are on the verge of a civil war and because the news media does not even recognize the validity of our grievances,and certainly never reports them, nobody thinks it is coming except the people preparing for it.
They know damn well what the polls say - long before WE do. They have folks who do NOTHING else but watch such things.
They know damn well how angry we are.
They know they're going to suffer an electoral bloodbath in '10 and '12 - if not a literal one before.
They.
Do.
Not.
CARE.
In fact, I believe they're *HOPING* for all of the above.
They're hoping for a revolt - because it will give them excuse to implement martial law and do whatever they please - as in "The Day the Dollar Died".
Failing that, they're hoping for a currency or other collapse - for the exact same reason.
Failing both - by some miracle - they hope to lose enough seats in '10 to give the Stupid-party 50-50 "ownership" of the inevitable economic HELL that's coming. If it turns around before '12 they'll claim credit, if not they'll blame the Retardlicans.
Either way, they'll have jammed through their socialist agenda which will never be repealed, and they'll build on it when the pendulum swings again.
Either way, they'll have paid off their Union Masters, and stalled the total collapse of Medicare/SS just long enough for the Retardlicans to take the blame.
It's actually brilliant in a sick, sad way.
Though it pains me to say it, I've come to HOPE for a real, bloody revolution - it's the only way we'll ever get to RESTORATION.
As to failing "to think our way around the media blackout" -- I don't believe it matters. I live in a very rural area - among a lot of folk who "don't see no use for that there internet stuff" - and just today I heard some older men say "I ain't too old to tote my rifle one more time..."
Many, many, MANY people don't need to read Sipsey Street to see what time it is.
When the time comes, we'll have the usual ~20% of the population behind us, and ~45% arrayed AGAINST us. Thankfully the latter doesn't own firearms because they're askeered of 'em.
Even WITHOUT the Marxists currently in power, we're approaching 1/2 of the people in our nation who look forward to living on the .gov's teat - even if it's the HIND one it beats having to hunt and gather. Further, they all know we're a threat to their "free" rice-bowl - especially the majority of whom agree 110% with their Marxist/socialist ideals.
This to me is the reason civil war is inevitable: roughly 1/2 the population is reasonably conservative, the other 1/2 is well left of center, and we've FINALLY realized that being "nice" and "civil" only means forfeiting ground again and again and again - thus slowing but never stopping the incremental march to a fully socialist state.
Every single "compromise" moves us further away from where WE want to be - and we're finally done giving in.
OTOH, the Commu-sociacrats are even LESS willing to budge, and have finally stopped even PRETENDING.
Two UTTERLY opposite world-views held by nearly equal numbers, and both sides unwilling to budge. Does it happen NOW (in this Administration) or do we wait and let THEM start it after the next Retardlican majority?
As with any painful, bloody procedure, it's only going to be worse the longer we wait - plus it gives The Enemy longer to get a clue and start in with the weapons and ammo buying and training.
It'll never get any easier.
Some excellent points on the coming chaos
by GunRights4USMarch 18, 2010
You know what's funny? Funny as in weird not funny, hah ha.And then an anonymous commenter replies:
Here we are on the verge of a civil war and because the news media does not even recognize the validity of our grievances,and certainly never reports them, nobody thinks it is coming except the people preparing for it.
They know damn well what the polls say - long before WE do. They have folks who do NOTHING else but watch such things.
They know damn well how angry we are.
They know they're going to suffer an electoral bloodbath in '10 and '12 - if not a literal one before.
They.
Do.
Not.
CARE.
In fact, I believe they're *HOPING* for all of the above.
They're hoping for a revolt - because it will give them excuse to implement martial law and do whatever they please - as in "The Day the Dollar Died".
Failing that, they're hoping for a currency or other collapse - for the exact same reason.
Failing both - by some miracle - they hope to lose enough seats in '10 to give the Stupid-party 50-50 "ownership" of the inevitable economic HELL that's coming. If it turns around before '12 they'll claim credit, if not they'll blame the Retardlicans.
Either way, they'll have jammed through their socialist agenda which will never be repealed, and they'll build on it when the pendulum swings again.
Either way, they'll have paid off their Union Masters, and stalled the total collapse of Medicare/SS just long enough for the Retardlicans to take the blame.
It's actually brilliant in a sick, sad way.
Though it pains me to say it, I've come to HOPE for a real, bloody revolution - it's the only way we'll ever get to RESTORATION.
As to failing "to think our way around the media blackout" -- I don't believe it matters. I live in a very rural area - among a lot of folk who "don't see no use for that there internet stuff" - and just today I heard some older men say "I ain't too old to tote my rifle one more time..."
Many, many, MANY people don't need to read Sipsey Street to see what time it is.
When the time comes, we'll have the usual ~20% of the population behind us, and ~45% arrayed AGAINST us. Thankfully the latter doesn't own firearms because they're askeered of 'em.
Even WITHOUT the Marxists currently in power, we're approaching 1/2 of the people in our nation who look forward to living on the .gov's teat - even if it's the HIND one it beats having to hunt and gather. Further, they all know we're a threat to their "free" rice-bowl - especially the majority of whom agree 110% with their Marxist/socialist ideals.
This to me is the reason civil war is inevitable: roughly 1/2 the population is reasonably conservative, the other 1/2 is well left of center, and we've FINALLY realized that being "nice" and "civil" only means forfeiting ground again and again and again - thus slowing but never stopping the incremental march to a fully socialist state.
Every single "compromise" moves us further away from where WE want to be - and we're finally done giving in.
OTOH, the Commu-sociacrats are even LESS willing to budge, and have finally stopped even PRETENDING.
Two UTTERLY opposite world-views held by nearly equal numbers, and both sides unwilling to budge. Does it happen NOW (in this Administration) or do we wait and let THEM start it after the next Retardlican majority?
As with any painful, bloody procedure, it's only going to be worse the longer we wait - plus it gives The Enemy longer to get a clue and start in with the weapons and ammo buying and training.
It'll never get any easier.
Why is the department of education buying shotguns?
by GunRights4USMarch 10, 2010
The U.S. Department of Education (ED) intends to purchase twenty-seven (27) REMINGTON BRAND MODEL 870 POLICE 12/14P MOD GRWC XS4 KXCS SF. RAMAC #24587 GAUGE: 12 BARREL: 14" - PARKERIZED CHOKE: MODIFIED SIGHTS: GHOST RING REAR WILSON COMBAT; FRONT - XS CONTOUR BEAD SIGHT STOCK: KNOXX REDUCE RECOIL ADJUSTABLE STOCK FORE-END: SPEEDFEED SPORT-SOLID - 14"
By the way... YOU can't own a shotgun with a barrel shorter than 18 inches according to the National Firearms Act of 1934! So what are they doing buying "sawed off" shotguns!!!
The demonization of making a PROFIT
by GunRights4USMarch 10, 2010
According to the most recent Fortune 500 rankings, health insurers are not even among the top-30 United States industries in profit-margin. Health insurers rank 35th, with a profit-margin of just 2.2 percent -- less than one-fifth the profit-margin of railroads. None of the ten largest American health insurers made profits of more than 4.5 percent, and two of them lost money. Health insurers' collective profit-margin is less than one-eighth that of drug companies and less than one-seventh that of companies that sell medical products or equipment. It's also less than that of medical facilities. Yet when was the last time you heard President Obama rail against greedy hospitals?
The combined profits of America's ten largest health insurers are $8.3 billion. That's less than two-thirds of the profits of Wal-Mart alone, less than half of the profits of General Electric alone, and less than one-seventh of what Medicare loses each year to fraud. Health insurers collectively have one-eighth the profit-margin of McDonald's or Coke, one-ninth that of eBay, and one-fifteenth that of Merck.
In all, the combined profits of the 14 largest American health insurers (the ones who crack the Fortune 1000) are $8.7 billion. That's less than 0.4 percent, or 1/250th, of overall U.S. health-care costs, which are $2.5 trillion.
Stealing Your Retirement No More Miranda and Fishing Illegal in America
by Greg FarberMarch 9, 2010
I guess the people of this nation are gonna lay down and take it..
AMERICAN COMMUNIST HISTORICAL AGENDA EXPOSED
by Greg FarberMarch 9, 2010
The American Civil War commenced in the year 1861. This was just thirteen years after the Communist Manifesto was fine-tuned in 1848. Claims that Marx invented Communism are just flat out false, he merely adjusted it to be less visible. Its working great. Unknown to most the final outcome of the so-called Civil War instituted a new quiet war on Americans by way of the Fourteenth Amendment.
To set the premise of this blog, the definition of a Manifesto is as follows:
MANIFESTO: A formal written declaration, promulgated by a sovereign, or by the executive authority of a state or nation, proclaiming its reasons and motives for declaring a war, or for any other important international action. Public declaration or proclamation of political or social principles.
WAR DECLARED
A manifesto puts forth political and/or social principles and a motive for WAR. In a broad sense, the Fourteenth Amendment is a manifesto: It is the Communists Declaration of War.
Pursuant to the Communist Manifesto, Marx calls forth the workingmen of the world to join in the fight against Capitalists. As a question of common sense, how can the lower class workingman have the power to create this power presence? They cannot: it is the World Elite who are behind this quiet war. The secret societies, along with the labor classes, are the tools of the World Elite Capitalists; the ones who pull the strings. “THEY” are the “Puppet Masters”.
The Fourteenth Amendment is actually a declaration of war, and will be proven herein. Accordingly, the amendment creates Quiet Wars on the de jure constitutional governments of the American republics, which are all foreign to each other and the United States. This means that all political jurisdictions are separate ( under the rules of international law).
The excuse for these ” Quiet Wars” can be found in the preamble of a congressional act referred to as the Expatriation Act (so-called). This instant Act was remarkably approved the day before the Fourteenth Amendment was announced ” Puportedly ” ratified. The purpose for these wars;
“….whereas it is necessary to the maintenance of public PEACE that this claim of foreign allegiance should be promptly and finally disavowed.”
Pursuant to measures of covert takeover, the insurgent governmental system–while not openly admitting to it–has currently defined itself in title 8 of the United States Code. here it is below:
Title 8 USC: 1101(a)(37). Definitions. The term ” totalitarian party” means an organization that advocates the establishment in the United States of a totalitarian dictatorship or totalitarianism. The terms ” totalitarian dictatorship ” and ” totalitarianism” mean and refer to systems of government not representative in fact, characterized by:
A) The existence of a single political party, organized on a dictatorial basis, with so close an identity between such party and its policies and the governmental policies of the country in which it exists, that the party and government constitute and indistinguishable unit, and
B) The forcible suppression of opposition to such party.
BASIC AUTHORIZATION DEFINITIONS
The placement of title 8 USC-1101(a)(37) appears to be a clandestinely placed definition, i.e. it is secretive bragging. Of course, there will be no admission that the above definition applies to the de facto governmental system; you must employ applied facts to prove it. Pursuant to this: listed below are its main definitional characteristics. The specific particulars are as follows:
1. TOTALITARIANISM
2. DICTATORSHIP
3.GOVERNMENT NOT REPRESENTATIVE IN FACT
4. FORCIBLE SUPPRESSION
These factors will now be applied to the federal government of the {U}nited States now in place.
A. Study the definition of TOTALITARIAN from the American Heritage Dictionary:
Totalitarian. adj. 1. Of, relating to, being, or imposing a form of government in which the political authority exercises absolute and centralized control over all aspects of life, the individual is subordinated to the state, and opposing political and cultural expression is suppressed.
B. Study the definition of DICTATOR from the American Heritage Dictionary:
DICTATOR. n. 1.a. An absolute ruler. b. A tyrant; a despot. 2. An ancient Roman magistrate appointed temporarily to deal with an immediate crisis or emergency. ( In our case it was freedom)
C. Study the definition of NOT REPRESENTATIVE IN FACT from Blacks Law Dictionary:
IN FACT. Actual, real; as distinguished from or inferred. Resulting from the acts of parties, instead of from the act or intendment of law.
D. Study the definition of FORCIBLE SUPPRESSION from Blacks Law Dictionary:
MARTIAL LAW. A system of law, obtaining only in time of actual war and growing out of the exigencies therof, arbitrary in its character, and depending only on the will of the commander of an army, which is established and administered in a place or district of hostile territory held in belligerent possession, or sometimes , in places occupied or prevaded by insurgents or mobs, and which suspends all existing civil laws, as well as the civil authority and the ordinary administration of justice. See also Military government; Military law. ( see also government de facto; Lieber Military code).
In other words put a Confederated Republic down subliminally over time after installing your Communist declaration, the Fourteenth Amendment. In affect stealing a Nation right out from under the noses of the Sovereign De Jure Nationals who own it out right. ( you and I).
Some may say a square peg is being jammed into a round hole. Nevertheless, in a broad sense all four of these particulars can be applied to the de-facto governmental system that is currently in place in America. This will be directly proven hence forth with the applied evidence.
Totalitarian Examined
Today, because the Marxist system and falsehoods are so widespread, you generally cannot get employment and do any banking without a Social Security Number. Congress has made no public effort to make it known that social security is optional, which it is. Ergo: One cannot work unless they have the “federal” number. If you cannot work or bank you suffer!!! Conclusion: you are subordinate to the federal government!!! ( the state).
The statutory system (both federal and state) has replaced the de jure civil law America. The common law was the law of the people, i.e. natural law, usages and customs. Simply put: The law of God. The common law is defined by Blacks Law Dictionary as follows:
COMMON LAW: As distinguished from statutory law created by enactment of legislatures, the common law derive their authority solely from usages and customs of immemorial antiquity, or from the judgments and decrees of the courts recognizing, affirming, and enforcing such usages and customs. The ” commons Law” is all the statutory and case background of England and the American colonies before the American Revolution. It consists of those principles, usage and rules of action applicable to government and security of persons and property that do not rest for their authority upon any express and positive declaration of the will of the legislature.
Under usages and customs, people of each country in the Union are governed by what they do and wish; such being under a system of self-government that is under the guidance of scripture; they are not governed by law, i.e. general legislative law based on the whim of the legislature. This is law that is ordained by someone who believes they know better: the people of station or the Elitists in the current de facto governmental system–THE RULERS! ( example being a small town council thinking they know better what we the populance should do or not do with our very own private property, it is of course of my personal opinion that anybody wanting to be on described councils are nothing more than complete and utter twits. Thus I will never run for any kind of governmental seat ever). Nor will I ever rely on said twits to be my deciders about anything ever.
The statutory system of law does not allow people to govern themselves by their usages and customs. All such dictated law generally comes from the decree of the federal government. Said government is not supposed to have interaction with the states that is outside the stipulations of Article 1, section 8 of the Constitution. Also, understand the 9th and Tenth Amendments.
It appears that: TOTALITARIAN is applicable to the de facto system. Federal, State, and local, being county, and city. Their all Marxists.
DICTATOR EXAMINED
Below are two appropriate definitions that are taken from the American Heritage Dictionary that will set up the premise of the dictator:
1. DESPOTISM. 1. Rule by or as if by a despot: absolute power or authority. 2. The actions of a despot; tyranny. 3a. A governmental or political system in which the ruler exercises absolute power. b. A state so ruled.
2. AUTOCRACY. 1. Government by a single person having unlimited power; despotism. 2. A country or state that is governed by a single person with unlimited power.
Do you imagine the above definitions are appropriate? You question AUTOCRACY do you? Do you think since “Americans” hold a presidential election actually precludes us from being under an autocratic government? Well, the de facto President of the United States can write an order referred to as an Executive Order. As Congress has nothing to do with such Orders, this usurps the purpose and protection of the Separation of Powers as set forth by the Constitution. One should note that thousands of these Orders have been written the past several years. Some are being enforced; some are just sitting there waiting to be used and enforced. Understand that the de facto Congress can invalidate these Orders, but generally it chooses not to. please see and understand the definition of totalitarianism in title 8 USC;1101(a)(37).
In conclusion to the above, the facts that were evidenced may be translated into a government that is administered by a single person having unlimited power–Ergo: DICTATOR.
It appears that: DICTATOR is applicable to the de facto system.
NOT REPRESENTATIVE IN FACT EXAMINED
Title 8 USC:1101(a)(37). This one is so easy to prove, again, the current sitting governments are not real governments. They are imposters that have seated the state governments under Terms of War via the operations of law set forth by the Fourteenth Amendment. Moreover, the real constitutional apportionment of Congressional representation ( i.e. de jure) in Article 1 of the organic Constitution. These apportioned parameters have never been repealed; wherefore they are even now in full force and effect. Therefore, all state and federal governments are not representative ” in Fact”.
The legal definition of “in fact” from Blacks Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition Deluxe, states;
IN FACT: Actual real; as distinguished from or implied or inferred. Resulting from the acts of parties, instead of from the act or intendment of law.
Moreover, the current state government{s} are seated in violation of the organic (i.e. the original) Constitution of the federation, the real ” Intendment of Law”. Accordingly, to further prove this usurpation and fraud, see this text that is found in title 8 USC : 1101(a)(37):
” The existence of a single political party, organized on a dictatorial basis, with so close an identity between such party and its policies and the governmental policies of the country in which it exists, that party and government constitute an indistinguishable unit”.
Comformably–pursuant to the forgoing congressional definition Franklin Delano Roosevelt may be Quoted as saying: ” There’s not a dimes worth of difference between the Republicans and Democrats.” ENOUGH SAID about the current governments not being representative in fact!
It appears that NOT REPRESENTATIVE IN FACT is applicable to the de facto system, Federal state local levels. Blaine county in particular.
FORCIBLE SUPPRESSION EXAMINED
To prove a point; Go to Washington D.C. or even our State Capital in Boise with a group of people. Tell them you know that they are imposters and that you can prove it with legal and documented evidence. Insist you want them to leave so that the government de jure can be seated: be commanding. Without a doubt, you will see some Forcible Suppression take place. Moreover, can you recollect any time where something was forced on the people of a state. I can think of thousands, like wolf programs for example.
Furthermore, for proof of the terminology of force being a factor of the insurgent governmental system that causes meddling from the foreign organization: the United States, look at most of the constitutional amendments past number twelve; the last section or clause states;
“CONGRESS shall have the power to ENFORCE this article by appropriate legislation.”
In other words : the forcing of communist/totalitarion doctrines.
It appears that: FORCIBLE SUPPRESSION is applicable to this de facto system.
Without a doubt the sitting federal government, the sitting state governments, all countys, and towns and or city councils fits into the definition parameters of title 8 USC : 1101(a)(37). which defines a Totalitarian Dictatorship. However, with some due respect it has been a somewhat benevolent federal one. It appears to rule with a Velvet Glove instead of an Iron Fist. FOR NOW THAT IS! They could not be too forceful or people would catch on to what is going on. You must note that it has taken over 139 years to get to this point ” THEY” are at.
The MARXISTS ARE “THEY”, and they are running the show. I’ve shown that COMMUNISM is very alive and well indeed and we are it. Welcome to the USSA, Land of the indoctrinated, and Home of the afraid to see reality.
It just happened last year folks, when Obama was elected.. Sure what ever..
