Stealing Your Retirement No More Miranda and Fishing Illegal in America
by Greg FarberMarch 9, 2010
I guess the people of this nation are gonna lay down and take it..
When Americans Need Leadership
by Tom RemingtonMarch 2, 2010
When settlers came to this country, what began as a simple escape to perhaps a better life, a chance to expand, to own land and to grow, became a struggle for freedom and independence. It was not the dreams of most who came here that they were in search of freedom but after putting distance between the iron hand of the King and life in America, many settlers began to understand what true freedom was all about.
It certainly was no easy task. It took a great deal of time before Thomas Jefferson and the others could pound out a declaration of independence, especially knowing full well that it meant surely war with England but it meant freedom and the newly experienced freedoms were worth fighting for.
Most don’t realize that from the time the Declaration of Independence was signed on July 4, 1776 and the Constitution was passed in 1787, on at least two occasions some of the people wanted to give up on the efforts to secure freedom. They postured for a dictator to take over. Some thought Patrick Henry could do the job. Americans were scared. Even though they liked the freedoms they had in America, it was a different lifestyle and fearing the unknown resorted to the ways of which they knew, those from their past. It took strong leadership and the words and example of someone who believed more strongly than the people that the path America had chosen was the right path.
History has taught us that the people have always needed leadership. Even though the entire concept of being a free American was our strength founded in independence, celebrating the God-given rights as was recognized by our founding fathers, even realizing the ownership of land and property in order to pursue life, liberty and happiness, as human beings we still look for leadership.
The antithesis to liberty and independence is a powerful government bent on controlling every aspect of a person’s life. For those who understand history and have a real appreciation of what constitutes liberty and independence, will push back against the tyranny of a dictator or a government usurping the limited powers granted it by the Constitution.
Jefferson explained to his fellow Americans, who out of fear and confusion sought the strong hand of a dictator, reminding them of their past.
One who entered into this contest from a pure love of liberty and a sense of injured rights, who determined to make every sacrifice, to meet every danger for the re-establishment of those rights on a firm basis, who did not mean to expend his love and substance for the wretched purpose of changing this master for that, but to place the powers of governing him in a plurality of hands of his own choice, so that the corrupt will of no one man might in future oppress him, must stand dumbfounded and dismayed when he is told that a considerable portion of that plurality had meditated the surrender of them into a single hand.
A leader will never impose himself or his rule over the people. A strong leader can direct the people and bring their focus back onto what has and will make them great, make them the free humans God intended. The people are feeling imposed upon and are not comfortable with the direction they are being taken. The time is ripe for a leader, someone who will not make false promises nor seek to destroy American’s liberties but to restore them. A leader, who by example, will bring the focus of the American people back to a strength rooted in independence and freedom.
Tom Remington
Related Articles
What Are You “Required” To Give For Information For The Census?
by Tom RemingtonFebruary 17, 2010
Proposed Soda Taxes Fall Flat, Says Black Activist, Calls Demonization of Carbonated Beverages Yet Another Progressive Attack on Liberty
by Tom RemingtonFebruary 10, 2010
Washington, DC: Proposed soda taxes fall flat, according to Deneen Borelli, a fellow with the Project 21 black leadership network, who says the demonization of carbonated beverages is just another example of the progressive attack on liberty.
“After the Obama Administration tried to put itself between me and my doctor with its health care plan, the White House – along with Governor David Paterson and Mayor Gavin Newsom – now want to come between me and my can of soda,” said Borelli.
“Raising taxes during hard economic times is a horrible idea and it’s doomed to failure,” added Borelli. “Elected officials should be focused on lowering taxes to getting our economy growing in order to stimulate job growth. Instead you have Mayor Newsom in San Francisco and Governor Paterson in New York using the ‘obesity card’ to make up for their budget shortfalls. Punishing consumers, beverage companies, bottling companies and small business owners will only add to our economic troubles. These politicians need to put themselves on a spending diet and worry about their bloated budgets and let me worry about my waistline.”
Borelli continued: “And then you’ve got Michelle Obama and the Obama Administration leaning on schools and on the beverage and snack food industries to reform their wicked ways. In spreading their gospel against sugary treats, they will hurt the ability of Paterson and Newsom to reap their sin taxes. It’s clear the progressives can’t have it both ways despite their ambitions. The only one harmed in the end will be the American consumer.”
In New York, Governor David Paterson (D) has reintroduced a $1.28 per gallon tax on sugared sodas – a proposal he first proposed and later abandoned in 2009. San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom (D) has announced his intention to introduce legislation to impose a undisclosed fee on retailers selling sugary beverages. By targeting retailers, Newsom bypasses the need to subject the tax to a voter referendum.
At the same time, First Lady Michelle Obama is the public face of the Obama Administration’s legislative drive to attack the presence of soda and snacks in schools. On February 9, she announced the “Let’s Move” campaign to allegedly “end the American plague of childhood obesity in a single generation.” While she asserted the role of the government would be “minor” in an interview on ABC’s “Good Morning America” program, her husband is creating a federal task force on the issue charged with formulating a “long-term action plan.” Additionally, Obama Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said on February 8 that he intends to ban candy and soda from schools. Senator Blanche Lincoln (D-AR) is expected to introduce legislation codifying this ban as part of the reauthorization of school meal programs.
“Social engineering is at the heart of the progressive movement,” Borelli continued. “The Obama Administration sought a cap-and-trade emissions policy that would raise energy prices and thus force Americans to use less energy. Then it was government mandates on health issues. Now, it’s discriminatory taxes on food and beverages. It seems there is nothing the so-called progressives will not tax and no liberty they will not assault to support their worldview.”
The “New Fascism” At Work In North Carolina
by Tom RemingtonFebruary 8, 2010
Snow storms dumped ample amounts of the white stuff on parts of the mid-Atlantic states over the weekend. Unfortunately, some town’s leaders either have never heard of a U.S. Constitution or Bill of Rights or somehow they think, like what happened in New Orleans, that just because the town declared an emergency, all of a sudden people give up their God-given and constitutional rights.
Other restrictions include a ban on the sale or purchase of any type of firearm, ammunition, explosive or any possession of such items off a person’s own premises.
I guess they thought they were doing everyone a favor ALLOWING them to possess a gun on their own property. Uh, uh, uh! This cannot be allowed.
Tom Remington
Related Articles
A Time For Anger
by Tom RemingtonFebruary 7, 2010
Justice in government starts with YOU..
by Greg FarberJanuary 26, 2010
And excellent Constitutional Scholar, from Montana no less. Who has taught me over many years and many others the true definitions of the Constitution. This is priceless information for free, I advise you down load it and study on it.. Only YOU and I can stop these misinformed thugs and their misplaced values, the Authority is ours not theirs. It never was theirs. Eventually when we prove this tyrant to be in error, they will show YOU who they really are, because they would kill you rather than return to you what is rightfully yours.
Red Beckman 1 – We The People are Above the Government
Red Beckman’s Fully Informed Jury Training Part 2
Red Beckman’s Fully Informed Jury Training Part 3
Red Beckman’s Fully Informed Jury Training Part 4
Red Beckman’s Fully Informed Jury Training Part 5 >>>>
Red Beckman 6 – Trust In Government Betrayed
Red Beckman 7 – Truth About Grand Juries
Red Beckman 8 – IRS Unconstitutional Under the Executive Bra
Red Beckman 9 – Grand Jury & Trial Jury Powers
Supreme Court Furthers Jesuit-Nazi/Fascist Agenda for U.S.
by Greg FarberJanuary 25, 2010
The U.S. Supreme Court has done it again. The Jesuits, ruling the High Court from Jesuit Georgetown University in Washington, D.C., has pushed 14th Amendment America one step closer towards a Fascist Military Dictatorship to be exclusively financed by the Pope’s cartel-capitalist, mega-corporations dominating Wall Street via the Knights of Malta. Since the Order’s Supreme Court has defined the powers of both the Legislative and Executive branches of American government by means of its unlimited, subjective and centralizing decisions since 1868, the Court possesses what is called “Judicial Supremacy.” This absolute judicial power (enhanced by the damnable “federal question jurisdiction” granted to federal district courts post 14th Amendment), clearly in the hands of the Company of Jesus ruling Washington, has been used over time to whittle away precious Common Law Rights of racially White, 14th Amendment American citizens (as well as all other racially non-White citizens) while simultaneously enthroning the Pope’s cartel-capitalist international corporations. The Court’s most recent decision has bestowed corporate supremacy upon Rome’s American-based, CFR-controlled, commercial monopolies over what remains of American representative government born out of the risen Son of God’s White Anglo-Saxon (English, Dutch-German) Protestant Reformation. The Pope’s “Holy Roman,” 14th Amendment, Corporate-Fascist, Socialist-Communist, American Empire (1868-Present) is now a de jure Fascist Military Dictatorship wedded to Wall Street—nationalized under the guise of a bipartisan (both Democrat and Republican-backed) “bailout” in 2008. Ralph Nader will have much to say about this judicial travesty, and rightly so, but he will never, no never, go to the source of the serial criminal rape of EXPRESSLY LIMITED, Protestant and Baptist-born, Constitutional government—the Devil’s Jesuit Papacy.
A review of TWO CASES mortally felling the Constitutionally-protected, inalienable, common law rights of White American Protestants and Baptists is most necessary if we are to grasp the gravity of the High Court’s decision rendered just last week. This may require subordinate explanations so please take time and slowly enjoy the read.
The First Case was the infamous Slaughterhouse Cases rendered in 1873—five years after the purported ratification of the 14th Amendment. The Court, in a 5-4 vote, overthrew Common Law Rights we American White men inherited from our White Anglo-Saxon Protestant forefathers. To secure these rights the heaven-sent, Protestant and Baptist-Calvinist, American Revolution had been ignited by Av1611 Reformation Bible-believing Samuel Adams, “the Grand Incendiary.” Adams had rightly contended American Colonists were being deprived of their Common Law Rights enjoyed by all English “Freemen,” he also stating the greatest threat to American Protestant liberties would be the Roman Papacy. After an eight-year war terminating in 1783, our victorious White Protestant and Baptist founding fathers ensured the protection of our hard-fought, God-given Common Law Rights in the addendum to the Presbyterian-Calvinist-inspired U.S. Constitution: that addendum was the Bill of Rights—an EXPRESS LIMITATION upon the powers of the newly revamped federal government first created by the insufficient Articles of Confederation. The Bill of Rights was authored by Baptist-Calvinist, non-Mason, James Madison—at the insistence of Virginia’s most influential Baptist-Calvinist preacher, John Leland. But the Court denuded the addendum’s limiting powers over the federals in Slaughterhouse. For it was decided that the “privileges and immunities” conferred upon all 14th Amendment citizens as of 1868, DID NOT INCLUDE English Common Law Rights originally secured by the “privileges and immunities provision” of Article IV Section 2 of the Constitution ratified in 1789. Associate Justice Stephen Field, a true American patriot and Av1611 Reformation Bible-believer, made his sublime and historic dissent accurately defining the holding of the Court to be an overthrow of the once federally-protected, “fundamental,” common law rights; in this case, the common law right to work for a living.
Slaughterhouse would serve as the new legal foundation for a series of successive cases redefining the Bill of Rights to be merely a “bill of privileges” conferred upon all 14th Amendment American/Roman citizens at birth. And these privileges, in their regulation by decisions of the Jesuit Georgetown University-directed Supreme Court, would vastly enlarge the powers of all three branches of the federal government. The president could now issue absolutist “executive orders” in time of peace, while the Congress, possessing the absolute powers of an English Parliament, could now regulate—via statute (however lengthy or obscure)—every action of its citizens in privilege limited only by decisions of the Court. When the Court will decide what is “Constitutional,” that opinion will not be limited by the intent of the founders clearly set forth in Jefferson and Madison’s Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions of 1798-99. Rather, what is to be deemed “Constitutional” will be controlled by the subjective (philosophical and religious) beliefs of the Justices. What was once a limited Calvinist Republic governed by law springing from the Av1611 Reformation Bible, is now an unlimited Jesuit Empire governed by the opinions of men—men secretly beholden to the “infallible” Pope of Rome via several ubiquitous and clandestine secret societies.
But to complete the power of federal despotism initiated by Slaughterhouse, all Common Law on a federal level had to be abolished. The once limited Protestant and Baptist-Calvinist Republic had been converted into an unlimited Jesuit Empire via the 14th Amendment thanks to the Radical Red/Black Republicans led by the wicked and ungodly Pennsylvania Congressman Thaddeus Stevens—”the old commoner” (socialist/communist)—who, for a job well done, was baptized into the Roman Catholic Church on his deathbed in 1868. The rights of the new American/Roman citizens of the new American/Roman Empire had been defined in Slaughterhouse in accordance with Roman Civil Law codified by Justinian, the Sixth Century Eastern Roman Emperor then residing in Constantinople. But there was still pervading a massive body of federal Common Law holdings securing Common Law rights on the federal level and therefore could be imposed on state levels. This body of law had to be overthrown. That day arrived on April 25, 1938.
The Second Case is the equally infamous Erie Railroad decision. The Supreme Court, led by apostate Northern Baptist and Rockefeller crony Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes, handed down another 5-4 decision at the height of the Order’s Great Depression induced by Roman Catholic short-seller, Knight of Malta Joe Kennedy. (Knight of Malta John J. Raskob suckered the average American to “invest” in the Stock Market during the “Roaring Twenties; Knight of Malta Joe Kennedy then crashed the market in October of 1929, making a killing for Rome.) While the suffering and starving people were distracted with the grand horse race between War Admiral and Seabiscuit, the Jesuits controlling the High Court ended ‘”the Lochner Era” (1905-1938) during which era several wonderful decisions were handed down securing Common Law rights from both federal and state infringement. All those magnificent cases were overturned on that day of infamy—April 25, 1938—, the day we White Anglo-Saxon Protestants and Baptists lost all federal protection of our Common Law rights. Those dear Common Law Rights so accursed by Rome included the basic Common Law right to work—to exchange our labor for property (money).
The following year in 1939, the first Internal Revenue Code was promulgated, subjecting all Americans to the socialist-communist, heavy and progressive, graduated Income/Excise/Privilege/Franchise Tax. The warning of Samuel F. B. Morse as delineated in his Foreign Conspiracy Against the Liberties of the United States (1835) went unheeded, the plot finally fulfilled. For the Jesuits, in accordance with their Counter-Reformation world government conspiracy, had robbed American White Anglo-Saxon Protestants and Baptists of their God-given liberties, no longer secured by the federal Constitution.
With BOTH CASES firmly in place, thanks to the absolute power (“judicial supremacy”) of the Supreme Court, the Jesuits could begin to effectively destroy the racially separated, highly moral, personally cultured, clean and neat, financially prudent, independently motivated and commercially productive White Protestant and Baptist Middle Class. Simultaneously, the Order would use the Court to protect and promote the building of the Pope’s American corporate monopolies. Cartel-capitalist corporations would steadily increase; White Middle Class peoples would steadily decrease. And the Jesuit Papacy’s dream of restoring the infamous Dark Age 13th Century would draw ever closer in accordance with the Devil’s “Mystery of Iniquity” (II Thessalonians 2:7).
On Thursday, January 21, 2010, the Supreme Court decided the Citizens United case. In yet another 5-4 decision, the Court removed any financial limitation whatsoever put upon corporations backing political candidates of their choosing. The majority “conservative” justices were all “New Right” Republican Roman Catholics, they being Chief Justice Roberts, and Associate Justices Kennedy (delivering the opinion), Thomas, Knight of Columbus Alito and Opus Dei Scalia. If there is now no essential difference between living breathing people (natural persons) and pieces of paper called corporate charters (artificial persons), then the ruling is just fine. After all, the Congress has been excise/income/privilege taxing individuals and corporations with the same income/excise/privilege tax, although at different rates, for the last 70 years. But if individuals and corporations are to be treated differently in the law, as was the case prior to 1938, this decision would be a crime! In all practically, it is a crime!
Obviously to all, this monstrous decision will benefit the Pope’s Fascist Fox News-backed Republican party—the party chosen by Rome to end every vestige of White American Protestant liberty with the imposition of White Jesuit Nazi/Fascism. But without the Slaughterhouse and Erie decisions, this wicked and damnable decree could never have been put upon a presently suffering American public—suffering as a result of cartel-corporate-capitalist, monopolistic, Wall Street fascists financing Communist Red China while serving the Jesuit Superior General, Adolfo Nicolas! —–Eric Jon Phelps, author Vatican Assassins-Wounded in the house of my friends..
In CONGRESS, July 4, 1776. The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,
by Greg FarberJanuary 24, 2010
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.
We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.
Button Gwinnett Lyman Hall George Walton William Hooper Joseph Hewes John Penn Edward Rutledge Thomas Heyward, Jr. Thomas Lynch, Jr. Arthur Middleton John Hancock Samuel Chase William Paca Thomas Stone Charles Carroll of Carrollton George Wythe Richard Henry Lee Thomas Jefferson Benjamin Harrison Thomas Nelson, Jr. Francis Lightfoot Lee Carter Braxton Robert Morris Benjamin Rush Benjamin Franklin John Morton George Clymer James Smith George Taylor James Wilson George Ross Caesar Rodney George Read Thomas McKean William Floyd Philip Livingston Francis Lewis Lewis Morris Richard Stockton John Witherspoon Francis Hopkinson John Hart Abraham Clark
Josiah Bartlett William Whipple Samuel Adams John Adams Robert Treat Paine Elbridge Gerry Stephen Hopkins William Ellery Roger Sherman Samuel Huntington William Williams Oliver Wolcott Matthew Thornton.
Taxpayers, Shareholders Should Be Furious Over Olbermann Comments
by Tom RemingtonJanuary 22, 2010
Washington, D.C.: After MSNBC talking head Keith Olbermann predicted the downfall of democracy due to yesterday’s U.S. Supreme Court easing restrictions on political speech, a policy expert at The National Center for Public Policy Research notes that taxpayers should be outraged.
Not only is Olbermann calling for reduced freedom in America, but the company that employs him has been using its own influence to save itself at taxpayer expense, says National Center for Public Policy Research Free Enterprise Project director Tom Borelli.
The decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission eases certain restrictions on the free speech of businesses, associations, organized labor and certain advocacy groups with regard to their participation in political campaigns. Olbermann suggested the decision in the Citizens United case would lead to corporations and wealthy citizens essentially buying lawmakers.
MSNBC is currently owned by General Electric.
Borelli said:
“To call increased political participation a threat to democracy is ludicrous. What seems to be the case is that Keith Olbermann wants to keep the playing field clear for his employer.
“Taxpayers kept GE solvent by bailing out GE Capital – the company’s financial arm. Yet the company now escapes Obama’s assault against the banking industry. Additionally, GE’s lobbying army – which has a $20 million annual budget – helped secure hundreds of millions of dollars for the company’s utility customers from Obama’s economic stimulus package, and the Waxman-Markey cap-and-trade bill that passed the House of Representatives would mandate the purchase of renewable energy products such as GE’s wind turbines.
“Let’s also not forget that taxpayer money was also used to prop up GE during the credit crisis. Shockingly, it’s our money that was used to pay Keith Olbermann’s salary.
Both shareholders and taxpayers should be outraged because GE CEO Jeff Immelt and Olbermann continue to use MSNBC to attack the American people in a failing effort to defend President Obama’s left-wing policies. Ultimately, for them, this effort may be a marketplace failure. To wit, GE’s NBC unit just today reported a 30 percent drop in profit.
“Immelt and Olbermann may have secured favors from the Obama Administration, but they are just continuing to prop up a losing enterprise.”
