Dougnit Tribute
by Al RemingtonSeptember 6, 2010
Dougnit
Don’t it make sense the Vatican would say stoning was “a particularly brutal form of capital punishment.”, when burning at the stake is her mark. ssh
Don’t it fit; Oppressor of nations comes to their “aid”.
Don’t it make ya mad people forgot vatican rome is anti-christ in every aspect. What if muslims found out rome made up their religion, like the other religions, her harlots. I bet they start burning stuff.
The link is not that special, information-wise. The pope taking credit for ‘life on earth’ as god on earth; his words, not mine. Some day we can look forward to the State of the World address from his poopery, eh? Beast.
Current Wolf Issue A Reflection Of A Larger Federal Government Problem
by Tom RemingtonSeptember 5, 2010
Radio talk show host Austin Hill’s article today in Townhall, takes a look at the problems this country is having in Arizona, with illegal aliens and Idaho and Montana with illegal wolves. To those of us who have been mired in this debate for years, Hill brings nothing new to the battle front. However, as the war for public opinion begins to shift from full support of the animal rights groups to common sense Americans, Hill’s article helps to get more of the truth out to a wider, nationwide audience.
Hill describes Obama’s efforts to intrude into every aspect of our lives while failing to provide the basic essentials for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
The regional problems with wolves and “coyotes” in Idaho and Arizona speak to a broader nationwide problem with our U.S government. With Barack Obama in the White House, our government has insisted on intruding into the most private and personal affairs of our lives, while it cannot (or will not) provide the most basic and essential services that we need.
Worse yet, the Obama government is one that is upholding the needs and interests of illegal aliens over and above those of citizens, and the needs and interests of animals over and above those of human beings. This ideologically driven Administration may seem to be a dream come true for some liberals, but a majority of Americans are seeing it as more of a nightmare.
It is quite unfortunate that it has come to the point where American citizens are now viewing the actions of our Federal Government, environmentalists groups and our Courts as a “nightmare”. If this is what it takes to bring this program of “wolf recovery” back to reality then so be it.
Yes, the wolf issue is regional but that regional disaster is made possible by a Federal Government. This is the same Federal Government shared by all Americans, therefore all Americans need to be made aware of the fact that their leadership finds more interest in securing the protection of a vicious killing machine animal over the rights of Americans. If it can happen in the rural areas of the West, certainly no place is an island, secure from the strong arm of government intrusion.
It is a rare occurrence that a news article speaking in opposition to the invasion and extraction of human rights via animal protection gets beyond the obscure back pages of a local rag. Most often what is written is pro environment, pro wolf, pro illegal immigration.
The battle rages on and for a word to those on the front lines, the appearance of this one article in Townhall is a tiny victory in our battle for truth and justice. Keep hammering away. We are being shown that when Americans are actually made aware of the truth, the majority are coming to their senses.
Tom Remington
Related Articles
Confirmed: Corexit Still being Sprayed in the Gulf Despite Government Denial
by Al RemingtonSeptember 5, 2010
WASHINGTON’S BLOG is looking into it…
Pentagon may apply preemptive warfare policy to the Internet
by Al RemingtonSeptember 5, 2010
In a piece for Foreign Affairs, the publication of globalist policy group The Council on Foreign Relations, Deputy Secretary of Defense William J. Lynn III paints a picture of dire threat to American infrastructure, disclosing for the first time details of a devastating cyber-attack on U.S. infrastructure.
That means it will not simply protect the Internet from an Internet cyber-attack but will initiate one of its own. If it wants to close down the Internet or control who has access to it, all they have to do is say they are making a pre-emptive strike against terrorists – like the Bush Administration made a pre-emptive strike against Saddam Hussein and his non-existent WMDs.
Control Of Food Supply To Be Handed Over To Department Of Homeland Security
by Al RemingtonSeptember 5, 2010
S.510 deceptively titled “Food Safety and Modernization Act” written by and for Monsanto lobbyists.
IMF, WHO and WORLD BANK Hold Nations Hostage
by Al RemingtonSeptember 4, 2010
IMF (International Monetary Fund)
Jurriaan Maessen
Infowars.com
September 2, 2010
It’s the eugenicist in the Discover Channel building multiplied by a million. Not simply a lone eco-terrorist saying “parasitic human infants” must die, but one of the largest international financial institutions demanding it. To make the contrast even more remarkable, James J. Lee scared the living daylights out of some Discovery Channel employees, the IMF & World Bank take hostage entire nations.
In its 1984 World Development Report, the World Bank threatens nations who are slow in implementing the Bank’s “population policies” with “drastic steps, less compatible with individual choice and freedom.”
The report, literally saturated with dehumanizing proposals, is devoted entirely to the World Bank’s long-term strategies in regards to population control:
“(…) economic policy and performance in the next decade will matter for population growth in the developing countries for several decades beyond; population policy and change in the rest of this century will set the terms for the whole of development strategy in the next.”
To illustrate how serious the World Bank is in achieving the overall strategy objectives on population control, the report does not shy away from outright threats:
“Population policy has a long lead time; other development policies must adapt in the meantime. Inaction today forecloses options tomorrow, in overall development strategy and in future population policy. Worst of all, inaction today could mean that more drastic steps, less compatible with individual choice and freedom, will seem necessary tomorrow to slow population growth.”
In the Foreword, then President of the World Bank and 1985 Bilderberg attendee, A.W. Clausen stated:
“(…) although the direct costs of The World Bank programs to reduce population growth are not large, a greater commitment by the international community is sorely needed to assist developing countries in the great challenge of slowing population growth.”
“(…) governments can use incentives and disincentives to signal their policy on family size”, the report continues. “Through incentives, society as a whole compensates those couples willing to forgo the private benefits of an additional child, helping to close the gap between private and social gains to high fertility.”
To give an adequate illustration of the World Bank’s preference for all-out government control over the people, and their intent on meddling in people’s personal decisions, the following quote will suffice (page 107):
“By taxing and spending in ways that provide couples with specific incentives and disincentives to limit their fertility, government policy can also affect fertility in the short run. Government can offer “rewards” for women who defer pregnancy; it can compensate people who undergo sterilization for loss of work and travel costs; and it can provide insurance and old-age security schemes for parents who restrict the size of their families. Each of these public policies works through signals which influence individual and family decisions- when to marry, whether to use contraception, how long to send children to school, and life expectancy, and whether and how much family members work.”
Under the header “Incentives and disincentives” (page 121), the World Bank proposes several more examples of government interference in the affairs of free humanity:
“To complement family planning services and social programs that help to reduce fertility, governments may want to consider financial and other incentives and disincentives as additional ways of encouraging parents to have fewer children. Incentives may be defined as payments given to an individual, couple, or group to delay or limit child-bearing or to use contraceptives. (…). Disincentives are the withholding of social benefits from those whose family size exceeds a desired norm.”
The report uses the example of China to make clear such measures can be highly successful if governments would only be willing to implement them:
“With the possible exception of China, efforts to raise the age at marriage by persuasion and edict have not been particularly successful.”
“In China the birth rate at the end of 1982 was estimated to be nineteen per 1,000 people, down from forty in the 1960s. The current figure, based on birth registrations rather than on a census, may slightly understate the actual birth rate; but it would still be well below current rates in South Asia, Africa, and most of Latin America.”
On page 124, the World Bank report further marvels at the Chinese government’s accomplishments:
“China has the most comprehensive set of incentives and disincentives, designed (most recently) to promote the one-child family. Since the early 1970s women undergoing various types of fertility-related operations have been entitled to paid leave: in urban areas fourteen days for induced abortion; ten days for tubal ligation; two to three days for insertion or removal of an IUD; and in the case of postnatal sterilization, seven extra days over the normal fifty-six of paid maternity leave.”
Bizarrely, the report even goes so far as to suggest introducing “sterilization vans” and “camps”:
“Male and female sterilization and IUDs can be made more readily available through mobile facilities (such as sterilization vans in Thailand) or periodic “camps” (such as vasectomy and tubectomy-camps in India and IUD “safaris” in Indonesia).”
Making clear that the overall World Bank population reduction strategy must be implemented in a country-specific manner, the report states:
“The specific policy agenda for each country depends on its political culture, on the nature of the problem it faces, and on what it has already accomplished.”
What does have to be global, according to the World Bank, is continuing urbanization: people nicely locked up in massive townships. The report explains:
“Living in small towns does less to reduce fertility than does living in larger cities. That many of these changes take time to have an effect only underlines the need to begin them now. At the same time, other measures that complement and speed socioeconomic change can hasten a decline in fertility.”
This report is completely in step with the strategies outlined by the UN, the Rockefeller Foundation, Ford Foundation, World Health Organization and IMF as they move to depopulate the earth in a consorted global effort. The pretexts for fertility reduction given throughout the report are “sustainable development” and “poverty reduction”. The truth is, so states the World Bank itself, to introduce and further develop “policy measures to increase people’s welfare as well as (and as a means) to reduce fertility.”
Smell Obnoxiously Covers Globe – Abomination
by Al RemingtonSeptember 3, 2010
DRAGON Sculture
So-called “knowledgeble” have decided we were coming anyways. Their source:
Dear CongressAsshole
by Greg FarberSeptember 2, 2010
Dear Congressman,
I’ve been keeping tabs on you Congressman, your last speech even made me smile, how touching. But not on the side of the face you think. You want to get this in your head young fellow, You’re not in there to make the House and or Senate laugh at us but to make it laugh with us. We’ve retained you for something more than your after-outdoors experience fiscal speech’s. $500,000 a year is higher than we have gone for your “Congressional” services for some time, and we want returns on our money. You know what we expect. We want more tax exemptions, and we want more control over public lands ! You’ve been fiddling around for a long time and drawing pretty pictures, but now we want to hear from you in the headlines. We want you to chuck the funny business and work up a little public sympathy for the corporation. We want you to make the people feel that we’re done for and we will have to get out of business unless we are given a bailout here and now. The country needs us more than we need the country. That’s your line ! As we of the board of directors laid it all out for you months ago.
Now then Congressman, come to life and wake up that House and or Senate ! We’ve made enough alliances for you, all you need to do is start pulling a few strings that we’ve placed in your hands, and the thing will go through. Besides if you father a really big Bill like that, and it passes, you’ll garner more public sympathy and gain more votes. Don’t make any mistake. Keep in our saddle and we’ll ride you a long way, we’ll keep you in that position you enjoy. But only if you play our game. A few other corporate board members met this week and they are not satisfied with you. This is a friendly tip. Get back into harness and help us pull our load and we’ll not forget when we get to the top of the hill. You’ve been paid what you’re worth in advance, but if the Bill goes through there’ll be a bonus. Anyway. We don’t know just what, perhaps another $500,000 more. At least Put that in your pipe and smoke it, and I think you’ll enjoy the flavor.
Now Congressman, this is straight from the shoulder. Personally, I believe in you ! I’m with you and behind you every minute that you play our game with us. But when you chuck us and start going for yourself or devil forbid for those ” people ” out yonder, we’re going to plow the ground from under your feet as sure as God made little red apples..
Yours truly
The Society of Jesus and the Jesuit Order – The Knights of Malta – The Shriner Free Masons – The Popery Witches ruling this political world – The United Nations, And any other cretin land, power, money grubbing asshole anyone can think of..
The Corporation.
Hurricane Earl Used To Steal Second Amendment Right
by Tom RemingtonSeptember 2, 2010
When will these negligent, idiot, elected officials get it in their thick skulls that they don’t have the authority to suspend the Constitutional rights of Americans due to a perceived state of emergency? North Carolina’s Governor, acting as any good Marxist dictator would do, declared a state of emergency due to hurricane Earl and as such bars lawful citizens the right to self protection.
Tom Remington
Related Articles
Al Gore is a Crook, Robber and Thief
by Al RemingtonSeptember 2, 2010
photo by Al Remington
The uncompromising verdict of Dr Mörner is that all this talk about the sea rising is nothing but a colossal scare story, writes Christopher Booker. Published Mar 2009, Telegraph.co.uk
If one thing more than any other is used to justify proposals that the world must spend tens of trillions of dollars on combating global warming, it is the belief that we face a disastrous rise in sea levels. The Antarctic and Greenland ice caps will melt, we are told, warming oceans will expand, and the result will be catastrophe.
Although the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) only predicts a sea level rise of 59cm (17 inches) by 2100, Al Gore in his Oscar-winning film An Inconvenient Truth went much further, talking of 20 feet, and showing computer graphics of cities such as Shanghai and San Francisco half under water. We all know the graphic showing central London in similar plight. As for tiny island nations such as the Maldives and Tuvalu, as Prince Charles likes to tell us and the Archbishop of Canterbury was again parroting last week, they are due to vanish.
But if there is one scientist who knows more about sea levels than anyone else in the world it is the Swedish geologist and physicist Nils-Axel Mörner, formerly chairman of the INQUA International Commission on Sea Level Change. And the uncompromising verdict of Dr Mörner, who for 35 years has been using every known scientific method to study sea levels all over the globe, is that all this talk about the sea rising is nothing but a colossal scare story.
Despite fluctuations down as well as up, “the sea is not rising,” he says. “It hasn’t risen in 50 years.” If there is any rise this century it will “not be more than 10cm (four inches), with an uncertainty of plus or minus 10cm”. And quite apart from examining the hard evidence, he says, the elementary laws of physics (latent heat needed to melt ice) tell us that the apocalypse conjured up by
Al Gore and Co could not possibly come about.
The reason why Dr Mörner, formerly a Stockholm professor, is so certain that these claims about sea level rise are 100 per cent wrong is that they are all based on computer model predictions, whereas his findings are based on “going into the field to observe what is actually happening in the real world”.
When running the International Commission on Sea Level Change, he launched a special project on the Maldives, whose leaders have for 20 years been calling for vast sums of international aid to stave off disaster. Six times he and his expert team visited the islands, to confirm that the sea has not risen for half a century. Before announcing his findings, he offered to show the inhabitants a film explaining why they had nothing to worry about. The government refused to let it be shown.
Similarly in Tuvalu, where local leaders have been calling for the inhabitants to be evacuated for 20 years, the sea has if anything dropped in recent decades. The only evidence the scaremongers can cite is based on the fact that extracting groundwater for pineapple growing has allowed seawater to seep in to replace it. Meanwhile, Venice has been sinking rather than the Adriatic rising, says Dr Mörner.
One of his most shocking discoveries was why the IPCC has been able to show sea levels rising by 2.3mm a year. Until 2003, even its own satellite-based evidence showed no upward trend. But suddenly the graph tilted upwards because the IPCC’s favoured experts had drawn on the finding of a single tide-gauge in Hong Kong harbour showing a 2.3mm rise. The entire global sea-level projection was then adjusted upwards by a “corrective factor” of 2.3mm, because, as the IPCC scientists admitted, they “needed to show a trend”.
When I spoke to Dr Mörner last week, he expressed his continuing dismay at how the IPCC has fed the scare on this crucial issue. When asked to act as an “expert reviewer” on the IPCC’s last two reports, he was “astonished to find that not one of their 22 contributing authors on sea levels was a sea level specialist: not one”. Yet the results of all this “deliberate ignorance” and reliance on rigged computer models have become the most powerful single driver of the entire warmist hysteria.
•For more information, see Dr Mörner on YouTube (Google Mörner, Maldives and YouTube); or read on the net his 2007 EIR interview “Claim that sea level is rising is a total fraud”; or email him – morner@pog.nu – to buy a copy of his booklet ‘The Greatest Lie Ever Told’
Fined, frozen and now jailed
The Marine Fisheries Agency was certainly onto a winner when it enlisted the aid of the Assets Recovery Agency in its ruthless war against our fishermen. In December 2007 Charles McBride and his son Charles, from Kilkeel in Northern Ireland, were fined £385,000 for under-declaring catches of whitefish and prawns in the Irish Sea, threatening the loss of their homes and boat. But the Assets Recovery Agency, using powers designed to recover money from drug dealers, also froze all their assets. To pay the fines, the McBrides tried to borrow against their assets. Now, for this effort to pay the fines, Liverpool Crown Court has sentenced the two men to two and three months in gaol for “contempt of court”.
Blown away
The Climate Change Secretary, Ed Miliband, timed his jibe impeccably last week when he said that opposing wind farms is as “socially unacceptable” as “not wearing a seatbelt”. Britain’s largest windfarm companies are pulling out of wind as fast as they can. Despite 100 per cent subsidies, the credit crunch and technical problems spell an end to Gordon Brown’s £100 billion dream of meeting our EU target to derive 35 per cent of our electricity from “renewables” by 2020.
Meanwhile the Government gives the go-ahead for three new 1,000 megawatt gas-fired power stations in Wales. Each of them will generate more than the combined average output (700 megawatts) of all the 2,400 wind turbines so far built. The days of the “great wind fantasy” will soon be over.
