Al Gore An Accomplice In Discovery Building Headquarters Hostage Taking
by Tom RemingtonSeptember 1, 2010
Make no doubt about it, the nut job, James J. Lee, who stormed the Discovery headquarters in Silver Springs, Maryland, is seriously sick between the ears. How will the left-structured media describe and deal with this guy? Time will tell.
MSNBC is reporting information found on Lee’s website, which has consequently been taken offline but some were able to cache it before authorities brought it down. Lee appears to be a left-wing, environmental extremist who hates humans and places animals at a higher level than humans. (Of course that describes any environmentalist.)
“I want Discovery Communications to broadcast on their channels to the world their new program lineup and I want proof they are doing so. I want the new shows started by asking the public for inventive solution ideas to save the planet and the remaining wildlife on it,” the alleged manifesto reads, adding:”Nothing is more important than saving … the Lions, Tigers, Giraffes, Elephants, Froggies, Turtles, Apes, Raccoons, Beetles, Ants, Sharks, Bears, and, of course, the Squirrels. The humans? The planet does not need humans.”
MSNBC falls a bit short as they didn’t includes Lee’s rants about “filthy”, “polluting” children and how we humans need to figure out how to live without them.
Interestingly enough, Lee claims he had an epiphany when he viewed Al Gore’s award winning movie, “An Inconvenient Truth”. So again, how will the media handle this? Remember that anytime the media even suspects an event like this could have been caused by a right-wing nut job (even when they make it up), they blame people like Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin
If the media follows it’s modus operandi, if we are to assume they are operating from theories and not political bias and their own hatred, then Al Gore, those who awarded him the Nobel Prize, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences and a host of others, should be labeled as accomplices. Should we immediately begin demanding an end to movies? Freedom of speech? The Nobel Prize?
Don’t hold your breath!
Tom Remington
Related Articles
Wolf Issues Become “Unprecedented” And Media Focuses On Hunts
by Tom RemingtonSeptember 1, 2010
Idaho Governor Butch Otter sent a letter to Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar asking for help in finding a solution to a serious wolf problem that was magnified when Judge Donald Molloy placed wolves back under the protection of the Federal Government in August of 2010.
While the letter contained expressions of frustrations at the Courts, a request for a new Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) to manage the predator problems, and assorted other dead end proposals and complaints, the media has instead chosen to focus on Gov. Otter’s request of the Secretary to have a wolf hunting season regardless of whether wolves are federally protected or not.
The Idaho Reporter’s headline reads, “Fish and Game says Otter will ask the feds to allow a wolf hunt“.
The Idaho Stateman opted for this headline. “ID, MT seek OK for hunting of endangered wolves“. And the Helena Independent Record has a very similar headline, “Montana, Idaho seek OK for endangered wolf hunt“. There are other similar headlines in other newspapers all pretty much repeating the same thing.
I find it interesting that of all the issues that surround the highly charged debate on wolves, the media has chosen to focus on Gov. Otter’s request to have the illegal Idaho Wolf Management Plan, that the USFWS approved before delisting, changed so the state can allow a wolf hunting season.
Why not focus on the sense of urgency in Otter’s letter when he described the situation in Idaho as “becoming more explosive” and wants a resolution complete within 30 days? They could have mentioned that Gov. Otter said “wolves are causing excessive livestock depredations”, or that the same wolves, “are causing excessive mortality on Idaho ungulate populations”.
The media could have just as easily turned their attention to Gov. Otter’s comment that the wolf issue was, “contributing to unprecedented social conflict”. And let’s not forget that Otter pointed out that because of the wolf issue and every aspect of the negativity that has come with it, hunters are now turning to a position of viewing wolves as nothing but a “despised nuisance”.
Are not these issues or at least a compounding of some or all of these issues, far more important than whether or not Idaho can have a wolf hunt? Is it because the media wants to bring hunters into the spotlight in order to portray them as the bad guys?
Otter tells Secretary Salazar that the new MOA needs to have assurances that people can protect their property and that Idaho hunters, fishermen and trappers are no longer going to tolerate having their license fees pay for management of a predator species that is destroying all the time and money put in over the years to restore elk, moose and deer herds. The Governor continues telling Salazar that IDFG will no longer use it’s resources to investigate wolf incidents. This can be done and paid for by the Federal Government.
Are these also not more important issues to discuss and draw the attention of the Idaho citizens to instead of whether or not Gov. Otter can secure the authority to put on another wolf hunt?
Of all the issues that need to be debated and dealt with, a wolf hunt is the last thing hunters are interested in. They want the wolf numbers reduced so that ungulate numbers will return to management goals. Bear in mind that a wolf hunt is NOT an effective management tool for wolves. Wolf hunting is simply an added side effect to entire management process.
It has readily been said by scientists and others who are very familiar with wolves that you don’t manage wolves. With wolves you are only left with spending endless time and resources developing ways to reduce, spelled kill, wolves.
I even believe that too much focus is being put on a wolf hunt by the Governor, IDFG and of course the media, some for different reasons. If Idaho were to be successful in getting a wolf hunt while under ESA protection, it will have no real impact on the wolf problems. It will act more as a pacifier to some and a burr in the bonnet of others, mainly the wolf lovers.
The bottom line is that should any of Gov. Otter’s proposals come to fruition, real control of the predator wolf will not be realized until fish and game managers discover what they are really dealing with.
In a recent letter sent to Idaho Rep. Lenore Barrett from Tony Mayer, founder of Save Our Elk, he described the solutions Gov. Otter is proposing in his letter as the “slow bleed” solution.
As far as the substance of the governors letter, It is doubtful that any such negotiations will benefit Idaho over the long run, and entering into such a requested MOA will serve as nothing more then the continuance of “tying Idaho’s hands” to this perpetual, ill-advised, ill-conceived Federally controlled wolf boondoggle, This approach guarantees the continued “slow bleed” of our wildlife ungulate and ultimately guarantees their ultimate demise.
I think it’s time for the environmentalist-controlled media to reconsider their headlines. Time to put their focus on the real issues, the meat and potatoes of the wolf issue and stop their direct and subtle demonizing of the hunters.
Tom Remington
Related Articles
Hardball Boycott time folks, stick it to Mathews sponsors
by Greg FarberJune 17, 2010
BOYCOTT–Most of this crap is bad for the human body and the environment anyhow.. Here is the poison list of sponsors for Chris Mathews propaganda HARDBALL BULLSHIT MSNBC – Marxist Socialist Neurotic Bullshit Company.–BOYCOTT
SPONSOR NAME ON HARDBALL
Advil LiqiGels
AllState Car Ins
Ancestry.com
BMW
Boniva
Charles Schwab
Cool Whip
DirecTV
GE
Gillette Fusion ProGlide
Hartford Insurance AARP Ins Program
Intel
Kraft Mayo
LensCrafters
Merit Financial
Neutrogena
Nissan
Philips Norelco
Porche
Scotch Blue tape
Starbucks Via Ready-Brew
Superior Gold Group
Tide
Universal Theme Parks
Source: Before It’s News
Another white washing spin out by socialist government controlled media lackeys
by Greg FarberJune 15, 2010
SPIN SPIN SPIN SPIN SPIN MAIN STREAM LIAR PUPPET MEDIA.. HA HA HA
Handling the Spin for Rep. Etheridge and Un-named ‘Democrats’
Obama White House Response To Oil Rig Catastrophe Too Slow
by Tom RemingtonApril 30, 2010
Unlike the wishes of the media to find reason to crucify George W. Bush over hurricane Katrina, nothing has been said about President Obama stalling for 8 days before taking what he is now calling “aggressive” action. And why the delay?
Of course the time of the “accident” is suspect but the timing of the response to contain the spill is even more suspect. Obama had recently made statements that he would encourage drilling and exploration or oil and natural gas in the Gulf of Mexico and along the East Coast, a move that surprised many because of his past statements opposing any expansion of domestic energy other than windmills and solar power.
So, is it only coincidental that the White House help is coming when it appears the oil slick cannot be stopped before it comes ashore? Allowing the environmental damage to grow would ensure that the American people would be dead set against any further drilling of oil in the Gulf. Isn’t that exactly what Obama wanted? And it is Obama’s people that will investigate the “accident”? Bwahahahaha Bwahahahaha
Stamp my forehead “I’m with Stupid”!
Tom Remington
Related Articles
General Electric CEO Challenged at Stockholder Meeting
by Tom RemingtonApril 30, 2010
Asked to Explain Extreme Attacks on Conservatives by GE-Owned MSNBC; About Company Lobbying for Cap-and-Trade; About the Cost of ObamaCare
Washington, DC: General Electric CEO Jeff Immelt was challenged on numerous national policy issues at General Electric’s annual stockholder meeting this week.
The questions came from David Ridenour, Dr. Tom Borelli and Deneen Borelli of the National Center for Public Policy Research, who inquired about:
* extreme attacks on conservatives by the GE-owned MSNBC,
* GE’s extensive lobbying for cap-and-trade,
* the possibility of a conservative/Republican backlash against GE,
* how much the adoption of ObamaCare will cost GE;
* any GE lobbying for ObamaCare.
The National Center for Public Policy Research owns GE stock.
“MSNBC, part of GE’s NBC Universal, runs programming that is offensive to a substantial portion of the population. Keith Olbermann has called the Tea Party movement the ‘Tea Klux Klan’ and has said the Republican Party wants to re-impose Jim Crow Laws,” said David Ridenour, vice president of the National Center. “Whatever your political outlook, I said [to Immelt], this doesn’t make sense for GE… I also asked what he was doing to address the perception — especially among conservatives — that GE stands against them. Quite a bit of applause followed. Immelt didn’t answer but went to the next question.”
Later, Ridenour asked the same question, noting he never received a reply the first time. Immelt said GE has never attempted to influence the programming of its news or public affairs programs. Immelt repeated that when specifically asked about an April 16, 2009 New York Post Page Six story reporting that a three-hour meeting took place between Immelt and top CNBC executives and on-air talent for the purpose of making sure CNBC had not become “too conservative.”
“I asked Immelt about GE’s support of cap-and-trade and the letter from its political action committee that stated Waxman-Markey would good for its business,” said Tom Borelli, director of the National Center’s Free Enterprise Project. “I specifically asked how much money GE was going to make if cap-and-trade passes. Immelt responded that he did not know, and I told him that was a joke. My second question was focused on the political risk of GE/Immelt being so closely associated with the Obama Administration. I added that stopping cap-and-trade is highly ranked on the Tea Party’s ‘Contract for America,’ and by pushing against the movement the company could experience reputational and political risk. Finally, I mentioned there could be a backlash against GE if the House flips to Republicans. I asked Immelt if he is concerned about or measures political risk. He didn’t acknowledge a political risk.”
In light of John Deere and Caterpillar having to write off expenses against their earnings because of ObamaCare, Deneen Borelli of Project 21 asked Immelt how much ObamaCare will cost GE. “Immelt had Chief Financial Officer and Vice Chairman Keith Sherin respond, and he said the amount was $15 million for first quarter 2010 and additional costs going forward… My final question was did GE lobby for ObamaCare? Immelt said they did not individually lobby on health care and that their position was covered through the Business Roundtable,” said Deneen Borelli.
The National Center for Public Policy Research has questioned Mr. Immelt in the past. Go here for a video of Fox’s Bill O’Reilly interviewing Tom Borelli about the 2008 GE stockholder meeting and here for information about news reports detailing Jeff Immelt’s alleged retaliation.
Texas Governor Perry Kills Coyote Menacing His Dog
by Tom RemingtonApril 28, 2010
Did you ever wonder why ignorant politicians, while lying and cheating and working hard at deceiving voters, pose for pictures with guns in their hands hoping someone will believe they are a hunter? I recall the brazenly moronic photograph of Sen. John Kerry, then candidate for President, standing in a half squat with a shotgun, poorly aimed while his hunting dog was thrashing the tall grasses in the opposite direction. There is a reason these guys do this. It’s because the media are dumber than they are and buy into it all. (Just to note here: Because candidate Huckabee of Arkansas actually is a hunter, the media didn’t know how to deal with both a real hunter and a republican and so they made reference that Huckabee must have been trying to prove his manhood……or something. Right Chris Matthews and Angrier Mitchell?)
Texas Governor Rick Perry was out for a jog. Simple story really, well for anybody with a brain. Perry is jogging with his dog, a puppy belonging to his daughter from what I gather, when a coyote comes out of the brush and begins menacing the dog. Perry took out his .380 Ruger, which happens to be equipped with a laser site and wastes the coyote….one shot.
On Michelle Malkin’s blog, she references an AP story and as is typical begins their piece by describing Perry as “pistol packing”. I doubt the AP knows which end of a gun a bullet comes out of. All they know is that guns walk away by themselves and kill people. I also recall the day that President Reagan was shot. Listening to the television news, I heard a reporter exclaim, “A man stepped from the crowd and fired several shots from an automatic revolver.”
But the ignorance born of hatred reared its head in other places. Newsbusters reported that MSNBC’s Dylan Ratigan wanted Perry arrested for hunting with a gun equipped with a laser site. That’s funny. I thought Perry was jogging and was defending his dog, which Texas law clearly says in permitted.
But that doesn’t stop the ignorant media from taking every opportunity to demonize their enemy, particularly if they can link that together with a little Sarah Palin
Much of this would have been acceptable if Ratigan was a comedian. Maybe he is a comedian pretending to be a reporter. He should decide because if he’s going to be a reporter, he should learn to know what in hell he’s talking about before he makes himself out to look like the south end of one of those north bound Alaska moose.
Tom Remington
Related Articles
Americans died and Bill Clinton lied II
by Greg FarberApril 21, 2010
Murrah Federal Building Survivor Talks with Alex Jones
April 21, 2010
Jane Graham, a ninth floor survivor of the Murrah federal building bombing in Oklahoma City, told Alex Jones she believes the attack was an inside job. Graham talked with Alex Jones on April 20, 2010.
From the Oklahoma Bombing Cover-Up:
On July 20, 1997 Jane Graham, a ninth floor survivor of the Murrah federal building bombing in Oklahoma City, made a video affidavit after she watched the video “Cover-Up In Oklahoma.” In that video, she recognized seeing two men who were caught on camera walking hurriedly away from the building after the bombing holding walkie-talkies. She says that she had noticed these men in the building prior to the bombing wearing General Services Administration (GSA) maintenance uniforms that she did not recognize as GSA employees. She previously wrote the following memo late last year which I am reposting for the benefit of those who have not seen seen it previously or heard of Jane Graham or this controversy before.
November 15, 1996 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: SUBJECT: MURRAH BUILDING BOMBING/INFORMATION AND MIS-INFORMATION WHAT IS THE REAL TRUTH, WHY ARE PEOPLE NOT BEING PUT UNDER OATH? WHY IS INFORMATION BEING SCREENED TO DETERMINE WHAT IS PUT OUT TO THE PUBLIC AND GIVEN TO DEFENSE? WHY DOES THERE APPEAR A UNIFORM CONSPIRACY TO ONLY GIVE PART OF THE FACTS/STATEMENTS/TRUTH ABOUT THE MURRAH BOMBING? FROM: JANE C.GRAHAM PUBLIC HOUSING SPECIALIST – FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND PRESIDENT, AFGE LOCAL 3138
This is my statement regarding the above. Approximately the last week of August, 1995, I contacted the FBI and spoke with a Mr. Joe Schwecke regarding the bombing and told him about events which I was aware of the week before the bombing. I made an appointment with him for Tuesday the 5th of September. HE never showed up. I again called and set up another appointment for the following week and that was never kept. On September 12, (I believe this is the correct date), I had and interview with a female agent in the Office of Native Americans/HUD at 500 W. Main, OKC. There were several agents there asking a set series of questions regarding the bombing as she explained to me. These same questions were asked to everyone within a 10 block radius. The questions were very basic, and few. When we were finished she said that was all and I said I was not finished. I told her of the previous report I had given Agent Schwecke and I wanted to know why no one asked questions about the week before the bombing and if anyone saw anything suspicious.
APPARENTLY THE FBI WAS NOT INTERESTED IN ANY TIME OTHER THAN THE MONDAY OR TUESDAY THE WEEK OF THE BOMBING!!!! AND ONLY IF THE RESPONSES POINTED DIRECTLY TO MCVEIGH. My question is why is it that they (FBI) were only interested if information was related to McVeigh? It appears that the FBI had and agenda which was to only target McVeigh and Nichols. The FBI conveniently dropped John Doe 2. Does the FBI believe that I as a citizen and a government employee and a survivor of the bombing, having been in the building at that time when it occurred, is so na•ve that I can’t see through what has and is being orchestrated by Washington? I contacted the FBI first by phone then by letter to inform them of three (3) men who I saw on the 2nd level of the parking garage the week before. The 2nd level of the parking garage is that level which is directly below the street level and customer parking.
These three men were standing just west of the double doors leading to the elevator, behind an older station wagon parked on the south side. They had a set of plans which appeared to be of the Murrah building. The reason I assumed the plans were of the Murrah building is they were obviously disagreeing on something and pointing to areas in the garage. Two of the men were approximately 5?8? and one man 6?1 ro 2?. Two men were brown hair, the tallest had very dark hair almost black and a mustache. He was wearing black cowboy boots, jeans and jacket and a cowboy hat. His hair was collar length. The other two men wore jeans one had a brown plaid short sleeved shirt and obviously lifted weights. At first I thought as I studied them they were with the phone company because I saw what looked like telephone wiring. Cream colored but short pieces. He also had a paper bag with something in it. We had been having some telephone difficulty off and on in the building and that was the first thing that popped in my mind. But then I thought why would they be in the garage? They are always on a floor at the closet area when they are fixing a problem and would not be in the garage. Next I thought they must be with the gas company.
There have been over the years gas leaks and maybe they were there for that purpose. As I studied these 3 men they were also watching me. At that time the man in the brown plaid shirt said something to the other man and he went to the station wagon and put the sack and wiring in the wagon behind the driver’s seat and returned to the group. They watched me until I went through the doors to the elevator. I had first thought of going up to them but thought they must have approval to be there in the building and they did have plans which they were discussing. The man in the brown shirt obviously knew what he was doing and was in charge even though you could tell there was disagreement among them. He reminded me of a surveyor or construction foreman except that I doubt that they would have been in that good of shape. These men were definitely physically well trained. I had intended to go to GSA but since I was in a hurry to get to work, I let it go by. Regrettably I wish now I had taken the time to go to GSA or to have gone up and talked to these men. When I first told my story the only question asked was “Was one of the men McVeigh?” I told the agent absolutely not. Then I was asked can I positively identify the three men? I told him I didn’t think I could be positive, and NO ONE HAD ASKED ME TO VIEW ANY PICTURES OF ANYONE. I WOULD BE VERY INTERESTED IN SEEING WHO WAS STAFFED IN THE ATF, FBI AND SECRET SERVICE PRIOR TO THE BOMBING AND IF THESE MEN I SAW WERE EMPLOYED BY ANY OF THESE AGENCIES.
I believe they were afraid I might be able to identify someone they did not want me to identify. I do have a good memory and I will continue to seek out and watch for these men to reappear and when I do I will confront them. This is not over. Also, Germaine Johnston, who also works for HUD saw and spoke to McVeigh perhaps as much as 10 minutes after in the alley where he was “parked” sitting outside his car on the ground around on the passengers side along with John Doe 2. McVeigh asked her if anyone was killed. She replied, yes a lot were. At that point shaken, he got into his car and drove off by himself. John Doe 2 departed on foot. Now I ask you, does that sound like a man who was running? I don’t think so. It sounds like a plan that went awry or something he did not know was going to happen. These are just samples of stories which can be told and have not been given t the defense attorney. I DID FURNISH MY TESTIMONY TO JONES AS WELL AS FBI. GERMAINE FURNISHED HER’S TO THE FBI, THEY DID NOT GIVE THAT INFORMATION TO JONES. BUT HE HAS BEEN TOLD ABOUT IT AND SHE WILL BE INTERVIEWED BY ONE OF HIS ASSOCIATES. —Jane Graham
American’s died and BILL CLINTON LIED, he still is a liar as well
by Greg FarberApril 20, 2010
The corporate media and Liar Knight of Malta Roman Catholic, Lackey for the Jesuit Order Bill Clinton has engaged in a protracted demonization campaign against the Tea Party, patriot, and constitutional movements for months now (with plenty of assistance from the Southern Poverty Law Center and no shortage of “experts” on domestic terrorism).
The main Stream Knight of Malta owned and operated ” NEWS” Adding Clinton’s criticism and warnings about violence against the government three days before the anniversary of the Oklahoma City bombing should most certainly serve as a warning — a false flag event designed to discredit and criminalize the patriot movement is now in the works and may be only days or weeks away.
I ask Bill Clinton and his liar MSM to explain away the live footage of local new media on the day of the Oklahoma City bombing and please tell us, DO WE NEED TO REDEFINE DOMESTIC ENEMY AND DOMESTIC TERRORIST ????????? I THINK SO… SEE THE PROOF PEOPLE AND WAKE THE HELL UP !!!
Oklahoma City Bombing RARE footage
news footage from Oklahoma bombing
At least truther Jones, even though he Protects the Jesuits, does expose the truth about staged false flag terrorism done by the u.s. corporate anti Constitutional pro New World Order government, past present, and future..
WHEN IN THE HELL DO SO CALLED AMERICAN PEOPLE STOP LOOKING THE OTHER WAY ?
Liberal Obama lovers can eat $hit
by Greg FarberApril 8, 2010
Keep in mind readers I personally do not go for the FAKE left verse right hate filled paradigm OF DECEPTION, BOTH POLITICAL PARTIES IN THIS COUNTRY ARE FRAUDS, and have been for 150 years. But I think this letter below is of interest.. I am not saying by posting this letter that I think Sarah is qualified to be the president of The Constitutional Republic of America, notice I said America, the second nation involved here of course is the anti constitutional u.s. corporation known as the United States of America.. There is in fact a legal difference. The fact is the human is not known that is Constitutionally Qualified to be president of the first nation, and they would not want to be president of the corporation version of America.. Only complete controlled slave dumbass imbeciles would want to be Papal puppets for Rome on the Potomac.. If a real man or woman stood up to serve as the peoples president and ignored the shadow government ruling elite controlled by the Knights of Malta, the Hofjuden Jew Traitors, serving the Superior General of the Jesuit Order this person would be executed by another CIA invented lone nut assassin.. As JFk was..
By Dewie Whetsell, Alaskan Fisherman.
As posted in comments on Greta’s article referencing the MOVEON ad about
Sarah Palin.
The last 45 of my 66 years I’ve spent in a commercial fishing town in
Alaska . I understand Alaska politics but never understood national
politics well until this last year. Here’s the breaking point: Neither
side of the Palin controversy gets it. It’s not about persona, style,
rhetoric, it’s about doing things. Even Palin supporters never mention
the things that I’m about to mention here.
1. Democrats forget when Palin was the Darling of the Democrats, because
as soon as Palin took the Governor’s office away from a fellow Republican
and tough SOB, Frank Murkowski, she tore into the Republican’s “Corrupt
Bastards Club” (CBC) and sent them packing. Many of them are now residing
in State housing and wearing orange jump suits The Democrats reacted by
skipping around the yard, throwing confetti and singing, “la la la la”
(well, you know how they are). Name another governor in this country that
has ever done anything similar.
2. Now with the CBC gone, there were fewer Alaskan politicians to protect
the huge, giant oil companies here. So she constructed and enacted a new
system of splitting the oil profits called “ACES.” Exxon (the biggest
corporation in the world) protested and Sarah told them, “don’t let the
door hit you in the stern on your way out.” They stayed, and Alaska
residents went from being merely wealthy to being filthy rich. Of course,
the other huge international oil companies meekly fell in line. Again,
give me the name of any other governor in the country that has done
anything similar.
3. The other thing she did when she walked into the governor’s office is
she got the list of State requests for federal funding for projects, known
as “pork.” She went through the list, took 85% of the m and placed them in
the “when-hell-freezes-over” stack. She let locals know that if we need
something built, we’ll pay for it ourselves. Maybe she figured she could
use the money she got from selling the previous governor’s jet because it
was extravagant.
Maybe she could use the money she saved by dismissing the governor’s cook
(remarking that she could cook for her own family), giving back the State
vehicle issued to her, maintaining that she already had a car, and
dismissing her State provided security force (never mentioning – I imagine
– that she’s packing heat herself). I’m still waiting to hear the names of
those other governors.
4. Now, even with her much-ridiculed “gosh and golly” mannerism, she also
managed to put together a totally new approach to getting a natural gas
pipeline built which will be the biggest private construction project in
the history of North America. No one else could do it although they tried.
If that doesn’t impress you, then you’re trying too hard to be unimpressed
while watching her do things like this while baking up a batch of brownies
with her other hand.
5. For 30 years, Exxon held a lease to do exploratory drilling at a place
called Point Thompson. They made excuses the entire time why they couldn’t
start drilling. In truth they were holding it like an investment. No
governor for 30 years could make them get started. Then, she told them she
was revoking their lease and kicking them out. They protested and
threatened court action. She shrugged and reminded them that she knew the
way to the court house. Alaska won again.
6. President Obama wants the nation to be on 25% renewable resources for
electricity by 2025. Sarah went to the legislature and submitted her plan
for Alaska to be at 50% renewables by 2025. We are already at 25%. I can
give you more specifics about things done, as opposed to style and
persona. Everybody wants to be cool, sound cool, look cool. But that’s
just a cover-up. I’m still waiting to hear from liberals the names of
other governors who can match what mine has done in two and a half years.
I won’t be holding my breath.
By the way, she was content to return to AK after the national election
and go to work, but the haters wouldn’t let her. Now these adolescent
screechers are obviously not scuba divers. And no one ever told them what
happens when you continually jab and pester a barracuda. Without warning,
it will spin around and tear your face off.. Shoulda known better.
You have just read the truth about Sarah Palin that sends the media, along
with the democrat party, into a wild uncontrolled frenzy to discredit her.
I guess they are only interested in skirt chasers, dishonesty, immoral
people, liars, womanizers, murderers, and bitter ex-presidents’ wives.
So “You go, Girl.” I only wish the men in Washington had your guts,
determination, honesty, and morals.
I rest my case. Only FOOLS listen to the biased media.
If you’ve read this far ………………………………………..
First Lady Michelle Obama’s Servant List and Pay Scale
First Lady Requires More Than Twenty Attendants
1. $172,2000 – Sher, Susan (Chief Of Staff)
2. $140,000 – Frye, Jocelyn C. (Deputy Assistant to the President and
Director of Policy And Projects For The First Lady)
3. $113,000 – Rogers, Desiree G. (Special Assistant to the President and
White House Social Secretary)
4. $102,000 – Johnston, Camille Y. (Special Assistant to the President and
Director of Communications for the First Lady)
5. $100,000 – Winter, Melissa E. (Special Assistant to the President and
Deputy Chief Of Staff to the First Lady)
6. $90,000 – Medina , David S. (Deputy Chief Of Staff to the First
Lady)
7. $84,000 – Lelyveld, Catherine M. (Director and Press Secretary to the
First Lady)
8. $75,000 – Starkey, Frances M. (Director of Scheduling and Advance for
the First Lady)
9. $70,000 – Sanders, Trooper (Deputy Director of Policy and Projects for
the First Lady)
10. $65,000 – Burnough, Erinn J. (Deputy Director and Deputy Social
Secretary)
11. $64,000 – Reinstein, Joseph B. (Deputy Director and Deputy Social
Secretary)
12. $62,000 – Goodman, Jennifer R. (Deputy Director of Scheduling and
Events Coordinator For The First Lady)
13. $60,000 – Fitts, Alan O. (Deputy Dir ector of Advance and Trip
Director for the First Lady)
14.. $57,500 – Lewis, Dana M. (Special Assistant and Personal Aide to the
First Lady)
15. $52,500 – Mustaphi, Semonti M.. (Associate Director and Deputy Press
Secretary to The First Lady)
16. $50,000 – Jarvis, Kristen E. (Special=2 0Assistant for Scheduling and
Traveling Aide to The First Lady)
17. $45,000 – Lechtenberg, Tyler A. (Associate Director of Correspondence
For The First Lady)
18. $43,000 – Tubman, Samantha (Deputy Associate Director, Social Office)
19. $40,000 – Boswell, Joseph J. (Executive Assistant to the Chief Of
Staff to the First Lady)
20. $36,000 – Armbruster, Sally M. (Staff Assistant to the Social
Secretary)
21.. $35,000 – Bookey, Natalie (Staff Assistant)
22. $35,000 – Jackson, Deilia A. (Deputy Associate Director of
Correspondence for the First Lady)
(This is community organizing at it’s finest.)
There has NEVER been anyone in the White House at any time who has created
such an army of staffers whose sole duties are the facilitation of the
First Lady’s social life. One wonders why she needs so much help, at
taxpayer expense, when even Hillary, only had three; Jackie Kennedy one;
Laura Bush one; and prior to Mamie Eisenhower social help came from the
President’s own pocket.
Note: This does not include makeup artist Ingrid Grimes-Miles, 49, and
“First Hairstylist” Johnny Wright, 31, both of whom traveled aboard Air
Force One to Europe .
FRIENDS…..THESE SALARIES ADD UP TO SIX MILLION, THREE HUNDRED SIXTY FOUR
THOUSAND DOLLARS ($6,364,000) FOR THE 4 YEARS OF OFFICE????? AND WE ARE
IN A RECESSION????? WELL…..MOST OF US ARE.. I GUESS IT’S OK TO SPEND
WILDLY WHEN IT’S NOT YOUR OWN MONEY?????
Copyright 2009 Canada [ http://freepress.com/ ]FreePress.Com ;
Yes, I know, The Canadian Free Press has to publish this because the USA
media is too scared they might be considered racist. Sorry USA !
