What is a “Black Agenda”?

by Tom Remington

Washington, DC: Mychal Massie, chairman of the Project 21 black leadership network, is critical of the premise of talk show host Tavis Smiley’s upcoming March 20 conference that seeks to set a “black agenda” for America.

“What is a black agenda?” asks Project 21’s Massie. “Jobs, retirement income, education, cost of living, crime and so on are not black American issues. They are American issues. It’s not predicated on race and color. So why is Tavis Smiley seeking to divide us when Americans should be coming together?”

Tavis Smiley, a PBS host, is set to hold a conference at Chicago State University on March 20 to discuss the alleged need for an exclusive political agenda for black Americans. Smiley has been critical of Barack Obama for not paying special attention to the black community and has taken black leaders to task for not pushing Obama to maintain a race-specific agenda for black citizens. Panelists at the event are reported to include noted left-wing luminaries Cornel West, Michael Eric Dyson, Julianne Malveaux, Jesse Jackson and Louis Farrakhan.

“Project 21, the group I head, exists because there are those who would deny there is a diversity of opinion within the black community,” noted Massie. “With panelists representing a political range from Jesse Jackson to Louis Farrakhan, it seems sadly obvious that Smiley’s gathering will perpetuate this myth.”

Talking to the Associated Press about his conference and black support for Obama during the election and the need for his March 20 conference, Smiley asked: “[N]ow that he’s elected, what are black people being asked to do to hold him accountable to our agenda?”

“Obama is the President of the United States of America, he is not the president of black America,” Project 21’s Massie countered. “He can no more be expected to show preferential treatment to blacks any more than Jimmy Carter was expected to have shown preferential treatment to white southerners. Smiley, who recently abandoned his ‘State of Black America,’ is apparently feeling left out. This seems to be just another way for him to promote Tavis Smiley’s race-mongering agenda.”

Massie added: “One need only look at the cast malevolent marplots Smiley assembled as a panel to understand exactly what is taking place. I can assure you this is about them heretofore not being able to capitalize to the extent they would like from Obama being in office.”

What’s Wrong With Government Is You

by Tom Remington

As long as we have people writing stuff like this:

The problem is not the system. It’s us—our “got mine” culture of entitlement. Politicians, never known for their bravery, precisely represent the people. Our leaders are paralyzed by the very thought of asking their constituents to make short-term sacrifices for long-term rewards. They cannot bring themselves to raise taxes on the middle class or cut Social Security and medical benefits for the elderly. They’d get clobbered at the polls. So any day of reckoning gets put off, and put off again, and the debts pile up.

it furthers the threat that some day, perhaps not that far into the future, a revolution will begin. At present we have a government that actually believes that “we the people” are the problem. That we the people are stupid, not capable of making the right decisions and that we need to just shut up and pay our taxes, give up our freedoms and our investments.

We the people claim our share of the blame for electing such idiots in the first place but now that it’s time for reckoning, these people are saying it’s ALL our fault. Sorry! That’s not right. We are where we are because Congress is a bunch of crooks, a bunch of power hungry fools, the very fools we were warned about centuries ago that once they figured out they could give themselves raises, they didn’t care any longer.

We the people will only be pushed so far and we are rapidly coming to a point of being pushed too far. We will fight back at the polls in November but if that doesn’t work, there will be hell to pay. Just watch.

Tom Remington

Bill O’Reilly does not respect the 2nd Amendment

by Greg Farber

His own words on FAUX news prove it.. A weather disaster, and a “National Emergency” nullifies the Constitution according to Bill Oh Really.. Just another Roman Catholic supporting his Massa Knight of Malta And Popers ass kisser Rupert Communist Murdoch..

Bill O’Reilly vs OATHKEEPERS

Michael Savage: Defender of Jesuit Genocidal Mass-Murderer Pope Pius XII

by Greg Farber

By Eric Jon Phelps

Radio Talk Show Host Michael Savage has now shown his true colors. After mocking those of us who know 911 was a coordinated attack perpetrated by the Unified American Intelligence Community overseen by the American Roman Hierarchy as advised by the Jesuit Order; after defending this genocidal Papal Crusade called the “War on Terror;” after refusing to admit there is absolutely no difference whatsoever between the Democratic and Republican parties, as they both are controlled by the New York City-based Council on Foreign Relations, Mr. Savage now extols to high heaven World War II’s greatest genocidal mass-murderer—Pope Pius XII.

Further, Mr. Savage not only defends the ungodly, Jesuit-trained Pius, he calls for his beatification by the Vatican, i.e., to be granted “sainthood” as the savior of thousands of Jews during the Nazi-SS Eurasian Jewish Holocaust. This is Jesuit revisionist history popularized by Jesuits Robert Graham, Robert Lieber and Augustin Cardinal Bea. The Jesuits, like Mr. Savage, attack those of us who know the Pope not only was silent, but in fact was the driving force behind that “burnt offering” of “perfidious” Jews realized by the Society of Jesus in full control of Bavarian Roman Catholic Heinrich Himmler and his SS/Gestapo. The Jesuits, like Mr. Savage, call us “communists” when indeed Jesuit-trained Stalin and his communists did emphatically state Hitler and Pius XII were arm-in-arm for the entire duration of World War II—the final half of the Order’s Second Thirty Years’ War (1914-1945). Well, did not Pius send Hitler a birthday card every year of his dictatorship? Did not Monsignor Ludwig Kaas, Chairman of the German Central Party, effectively give Hitler the election in 1933? Did not Knight of Malta Franz von Papen bring Hitler to power due to the papal knight’s influence over President Hindenburg? Was not Von Papen then made Vice Chancellor to oversee the homosexual Austrian’s every move? Did not Von Papen negotiate the Reich Concordat for Hitler in 1933, Cardinal Secretary of State Eugenio Pacelli finalizing that treaty—a treaty that is still in effect?

Mr. Savage relies upon three spurious witnesses in defense of the indefensible Pope Pius XII of Jesuit making. The first is Jewish Labor Zionist Golda Meir, she praising the Pope for saving thousands of Jews from Hitler’s death camps. Why would she do so when she knew that President David Ben Gurion’s Rudolf Kastner aided and abetted Nazi-SS Colonels Adolf Eichmann and Kurt Becher in sending over 400,000 Hungarian Jews to Auschwitz at the end of 1944? Ben Hecht’s Perfidy accurately explains this enigma as mere high treason to the Hebrew/Jewish people of Israel. The second witness is another Bible-rejecting, atheist Jew, Albert Einstein, the pathological liar and savior of the false science of heliocentricity as opposed to the truly scientific and biblical reality of geocentricity. Never mind that Einstein was the mere puppet of his mentor, Belgian Jesuit Georges-Henri Lemaitre, promoter of the nonsensical, unverifiable and ridiculous “Big Bang Theory.” Finally, there is the Chief Rabbi of Rome, Israel Zolli. This man reigns supreme over Pius’ other two “witnesses” for his cowardice and collusion in the hands-on murder of his fellow Jews of Rome. While Nazi-SS/Gestapo Lt. Colonel Herbert Kappler eliminated Rome’s old Jewish ghetto sending over 1,000 Jews to Auschwitz, the Chief Rabbi refused to denounce Pius XII—the very creator of the Bavarian Roman Catholic German Third Reich—to the Jewish people. After the Holocaust facilitating the establishment of the Pope’s Revived Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem, i.e., Israel, the good rabbi changed his first name from “Israel” to “Eugenio” in honor of his monstrous master, Eugenio Pacelli—Pope Pius XII.

No, this is not a story of heroism, rather a nightmare of horror. Pope Pius XII, the slave of Jesuit Superior General Wlodimir Ledochowski, was trained, educated and programed for his hour of mass-extirpation of “accursed heretics, liberals and infidels.” Pius was fulfilling the Jesuit Order’s wicked Council of Trent, thus further annihilating what remained of a White Protestant Europe born out of the German and Dutch Reformations. Pius XII is a pious fraud. May his name be a name of ignominious legend, forever to be held in contempt of all honorable men—including, quite possibly, Michael Savage.

But then again, “Michael Savage” is in fact Michael Weiner, a racial Jew and, evidenced by his writings, a “Vatican Hofjuden,” a Papal Court Jew. Like the leading Jews of the First Century who condemned the Lord Jesus Christ, Michael Savage has “no king but Caesar” (John 19:15)–Papal Caesar Benedict XVI, residing in Caesar’s Palace—the Vatican in St. Peter’s Square. As do all Papal Court Jews, Michael needs to repent of his sins, believe the glorious gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ and then cease serving the Papacy—“Mystery, Babylon the Great, the Mother of Harlots and Abominations of the Earth” (Revelation 17:5).

Black Activists Respond to Reid’s Racial Remarks

by Tom Remington

Washington, DC: Black conservatives with the Project 21 leadership network are speaking out about the recently-revealed racial comments about Barack Obama that were made by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) in 2008:

Mychal Massie (chairman of Project 21): “Harry Reid is a loathsome individual whose apology was based on exposure not repentance. Reid’s comments are proof positive that the racial animus of the past is alive and prevalent among liberals today, notwithstanding the fact that their standard-bearer is a black man.”

Robert A. George: “How nice to see that, when it comes to race in America, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has such, ahem, ‘enlightenment’ (pun intended). Thank goodness no jive-talkin’ darky ever thought about running for president! No way Reid could have supported him!!” (This quote comes from Robert’s “Ragged Thots” blog. The entire post can be seen at http://raggedthots.blogspot.com.)

Bob Parks: “The hazard of being an apologist is having your own words thrown back in your face. Obama demanded the Republicans drum Senator Trent Lott out of their party in 2002 when Lott gave inappropriate praise to centenarian and reformed segregationist senator Strom Thurmond on his birthday. The underlying problem here is that boneheaded racist statements by politicians are all too common, and only conservatives seem to get called on them and punished. Republicans did strip Lott of his leadership post. Obama is absolving the Democrats of acting against Reid. This is a dangerous trend.” (More can be found on Bob’s “Black and Right” web site at http://www.black-and-right.com.)

Lisa Fritsch: “Why would Harry Reid apologize now when it seems clear he felt it and meant it at the time? It was less likely ‘a poor choice of words’ than an honest reflection of Reid’s character.”

R. Dozier Gray: “Black people historically have a lot of forgiveness in their hearts for people who make statements like the one Reid made. I might have forgiven him long ago had he sought to be accountable when he realized that what he said was stupid instead of when he realized that a book featuring it was coming out. But the black ‘leadership’ will likely let this slide. Power is usually more important to them than this sort of soft racism from a political ally. Truth be told, some of the policies advocated by Reid and his allies are more damaging than a few of his random racial comments.”

Darryn “Dutch” Martin: “In the grand scheme of things, what Reid said, his apology and Obama’s acceptance of it is irrelevant. What is striking is that Reid said it in 2008, a Time magazine reporter knew it and didn’t make it public until 2010! Why wasn’t it reported as soon as it became known? Would the mainstream media exercise such restraint and bury a newsworthy quote if a conservative public figure made a similar linguistic faux pas? I think not.”

In the book Game Change, set to be released Monday, authors Mark Halpern and John Heilemann write that Reid privately analyzed the electoral appeal of then-Senator Barack Obama, referring to Obama as “light-skinned” with “no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one.”

When the comments were posted on Marc Ambinder’s Atlantic magazine website, Reid expressed “deep regret [for] using such a poor choice of words.” President Obama issued a rare immediate public statement saying he “accepted Harry’s apology without question.”

Reid is no stranger to using the race card for political gain. In December 2009, for example, Reid compared those who opposed a government takeover of health care to lawmakers who opposed abolishing slavery and civil rights legislation.

Chris Matthews “White” Tea Parties Remark Contested

by Tom Remington

Black Tea Partiers Rip Chris Matthews for “Monochromatic” Remark

Washington, DC: On the January 5 edition of his MSNBC program “Hardball,” Chris Matthews claimed that everyone participating in tea party rallies such as the one held in Washington, D.C. on September 12, 2009 were white.

In a discussion with Mark McKinnon of the Daily Beast and Susan Page of USA Today, Matthews said: “And they’re monochromatic, right?… Meaning they’re all white. All of them — every single one of them — is white.”

Members of the Project 21 black leadership disagree. They were there.

Bob Parks, a Project 21 member from Virginia, said: “Here’s a news flash for Chris Matthews. I was there. So was my son. Last time I checked, both of us are black — and we weren’t the only black people there. I know other black people who attended the September 12 rally in Washington, including some of the ones who spoke at the podium! I guess the MSNBC camera people missed them.”

“To me, this means Chris Matthews thinks that blacks who don’t toe the liberal line are either invisible – and apparently irrelevant – or such sellouts that they’ve become white. Obviously, he doesn’t have the guts to have us on ‘Hardball’ so he can call us all-white ‘teabaggers’ to our faces.”

Project 21 Fellow Deneen Borelli of New York was one of the speakers at the September 12 rally. She said: “Chris Matthews’ statement exposes how his narrow-minded liberal bias blinds him to the truth. I was a speaker at the FreedomWorks 9.12 March on D.C. and several similar rallies in Pennsylvania. I’m also an active member in a local tea party organization. The tea party movement is not about color. It is about Americans expressing their concerns about the growth of government which will diminish individual liberty.”

Borelli continued: “Chris Matthews may be the first liberal of the new year to play the race card to try to stifle First Amendment rights to free speech and assembly, but I’m sure he won’t be the last.”

Besides the September 12 rally in Washington, D.C., Deneen also spoke at tea party rallies in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on September 9, 2009 and Harrisburg, Pennsylvania on November 14, 2009. She has been asked to speak at the “Tax Day Tea Party” being organized by FreedomWorks in Washington, D.C. for April 15, 2010 and is a member of the White Plains Tea Party in New York.

Project 21, established in 1992, is sponsored by the National Center for Public Policy Research (http://www.nationalcenter.org).

JFK’s Conspiracy speech five months prior to his assassination

by Greg Farber

Gosh, even liberal Presidents talked of media misinformation, and the value of freedom of speech, even the value of dissent, and the value of telling the ugly truth. JFK did just that while speaking to the Newspaper Publishers directly at this event. How we have changed in forty-five years. Progressively for the worst. If one wants to speak out today, then one must be willing to indure the cat-calls, apparent attempts at insult, name calling, and assumptions of ones daily activities and lifestyles, and worse, if one defends such attacks in like manner, one gets banned, accused of the attacks itself, and further demonized with lies and hatred. The brave new world of half-wits, half names…and keyboard commandos. How hillarious. Enjoy John F. Kennedy, who spoke out and acted out once to often and paid the ultimate price for truth.

” The very word “secrecy” is repugnant in a free society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.”

But I do ask every publisher, every editor, and every newsman in the nation to reexamine his own standards, and to recognize the nature of our country’s peril. In time of war, the government and the press have customarily joined in an effort based largely on self disipline, to prevent unauthorized disclosures to the enemy. In time of “clear and present danger.” the courts have held that even the priviledged rights of the First Amendment must yield to the public’s need for national security.

( I do disagree with his use of the words “Priviledged Rights” he chose here, The government was never allowed the priviledge of adjusting the meaning of the Rights via the Bill of Rights into priviledged rights., and MUST at all times keep the populance fully informed of all its actions and why, simply put, our Rights ARE no man made governments right to give to us, nor remove from us, PERIOD).

Today no war has been declared–and however fierce the struggle may be, it may never be declared in the traditional fashion. Our way of life is under attack. (By the government he represents at the moment he said this) Those who make themselves our enemy are advancing around the globe. (The U.N.) The survival of our friends is in danger. And yet no war has been declared. no borders have been crossed by marching troops, no missiles have been fired.

( Actually it has been declared but was never announced to the world in public, our borders were crossed by foreign agents via banking and political cartels with the intentions of the ruination of the Constitution, this foreign task is all but complete today. see the 1822 Treatise of Verona and this very governments Monroe Doctrine in answer to that Treatise, also see the Council of Trent, and their goals to destroy Republics via Democracy, and then ruin Democracy via Socialism and Communism. Our country was well into this process since the 1868 14th Roman Dogma Amendment). (JFK did try to stop these enemys advances on us. Those efforts are recorded in the Library of Congress and many books and documents. He was publically beheaded as is the way of fascists, to warn off other attempts to derail their schemes.)

If the press is awaiting a declaration of war before it imposes the self-disipline of combat conditions, then I can only say that no war ever posed a greater threat to our security. If you are awaiting a finding of “clear and present danger”, then I can only say that the danger has never been more clear and its presence has never been more imminent. (No shit).

( JFK, in his administration never had a chance at truth, Abraham Lincoln complained of the Jesuit owned Newspapers lying to the public while he himself was in office, it could only be worse 90+ years later for Kennedy. How bad is it today? )

It requires a change in outlook, a change in tactics, a change in missions–by government, by the people, by every businessman or labor leader, and by every newspaper. For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless CONSPIRACY that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence on infiltration instead of invasion, (And you can see who it is here, http://www.vaticanassassins.org/ and here http://www.ctwilcox.com ) on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations. (He, the once president of this country just described British SIS-who-controls-the-CIA-ISI-Mossad-NSA and other Intelligenica agencies).

Its preparations are concealed, not published, ( Are to, if you know where to look) its mistakes are buried, ( True, but I dug them up), not headlined, its dissenters are silenced, not praised, We are working on that problem). No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret revealed. It conducts the (HOAX) Cold War, in short, with a war time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match. (Listen to how JFK describes us).

Nevertheless every democracy recognizes the necessary restraints of national security–and the question remains whether those restraints need to be more strictly observed if we are to oppose this kind of attack as well as outright invasion.

For the facts of the matter are that this nation’s foes have openly boasted of acquiring through our newspapers information they would otherwise hire agents to acquire through theft, bribery or espionage; (Thats incorrect, and nothing more than propaganda used to instill fear in the nation’s peoples, Newspapers were just as worthless in that era as they are today, just note the John Pollard espionage case years later just as one example.) that details of this nation’s covert preparations to counter the enemy’s covert operations have been available to every newspaper reader, friend and foe alike; that the size; the strength, the location and the nature of forces and weapons, and our plans and strategy for their use, have all been pinpointed in the press and other news media (bullshit) to a degree sufficient to satisfy any foreign power; and that, in at least one case, the publication of details concerning a secret mechanism whereby satellites were followed required its alteration at the expense of considerable time and money.

The Newspapers which printed these stories were loyal, patriotic, responsible and well meaning. (Doubt it) Had we been engaged in open warfare, they undoubtedly would not have published such items. But in the absense of open warfare. they recognized only the tests of journalism and not the tests of national security. And my question tonight is whether additional tests should now be adopted.

The question is for you alone to answer. No public official should answer it for you. No governmental plan should impose its restraints against your will. But I would be failing in my duty to the nation, in considering all of the responsibilities that we now bear and all of the means at hand to meet those responsibilities, if I did not commend this problem to your attention, and urge its thoughtful consideration. End.

Obviously the American media went way over board in the keeping of truths of the domestic nature concerning government entities away from the population of this country, and of those illegal actions taken up by several politicians and other government agents. Thus hundreds of conspiracies go unpunished today, including the murder of this president. I will post another paragraph now from this speech, and the link to the JFK library for those wanting to seek the entire speech out.

http://www.jfklibrary.org/Historical+Resources/Archives/Reference+Desk/Speeches/JFK/003POF3NewspaperPublishers04271961.htm

“It is the unprecendented nature of this challenge that also gives rise to your second obligation–an obligation which I share. And that is our obligation to inform and alert the American people–to make certain they possess all the facts that they need, and understand them as well–the perils, the prospects, the purposes of our program and the choices we face.”

” I not only could not stifle controversy among readers–I WELCOME IT. This administration intends to be candid about its errors; for as a wise man once said : “An error does not become a mistake until you refuse to correct it.” We intend to accept full responsibility for our errors; and we expect you to print them out when we miss them.”

” Without debate, without criticism, no administration and no country can succeed–and no Republic can survive. That is why the Athenian lawmaker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy. And that is why our press was protected by the First Amendment–the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution–not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and the sentimental, not to simply give the public what it wants–but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crisis,and our choices, to lead, mold, educate and sometimes even anger public opinion.”

This president said that ugly word right out the gate here didn’t he, CONSPIRACY. A Conspiracy to make slaves of us, dumb us down, lead us down the merry path to GLOBAL GOVERNANCE, once called the New World Order…they knew they needed a change-up, to many are starting to get it. It should be a real blast, I can’t wait.

Well then, the media at large blew that concept to hell in a handbasket for the last 150 years then. So much for keeping a nations people well informed. Stupified is more correct. Even mention of criminal political events and circumstances gets the blind faithful in denial defending the crooks and angry at one for pointing it out. And who gained from it ? Not I, said the dissident. NOT I.

Associated Press Declares War on Alternative Medicine (opinion)

by Al Remington

Saturday, November 07, 2009 by: Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor.

In 2006, the world spent $643 billion on pharmaceuticals. Where are the cures?

• There are no pharmaceutical cures for cancer.
• There are no pharmaceutical cures for heart disease.
• There are no pharmaceutical cures for diabetes.
• There are no pharmaceutical cures for kidney disease.
• There are no pharmaceutical cures for depression.
• There are no pharmaceutical cures for liver disease.
• There are no pharmaceutical cures for Alzheimer’s disease.

… in fact, if you add it all up, the pharmaceutical industry is the biggest rip-off in the history of medicine! The world spends nearly a trillion dollars a year on pharmaceuticals now, and yet there hasn’t been a single cure found by the drug industry for any major disease or health condition.

Not a single cure.

Where is the cure for cancer? For diabetes? For heart disease?

The AP is a powerful, global news manufacturer. Its stories are picked up and republished by thousands of newspapers around the world. Because it is creating “ready-for-publication” news to be dropped into newspapers and magazines, it is supposed to write objective news, without the level of editorializing that you might expect from blogs or sites like NaturalNews. AP is supposed to be leave editors’ opinions out of the stories and just print the actual news.

But instead, AP is now prefacing many of their health stories with this stilted, opinionated and completely inaccurate statement attempting to trash the entire alternative medicine industry. That’s not a news service… that’s just a highly opinionated smear against the only industry that offers any real solutions for lasting health.

(NaturalNews) The Associated Press has declared war on alternative medicine, publishing a series of stories attacking everything from nutritional therapies to bioidentical hormones. These stories, which are syndicated across thousands of websites around the world, are prefaced with the following highly-opinionated “Editor’s Note”:

EDITOR’S NOTE: Ten years and $2.5 billion in research have found no cures from alternative medicine. Yet these mostly unproven treatments are now mainstream and used by more than a third of all Americans. This is one in an occasional series examining their use and potential risks.

What this note reveals is an extraordinary bias against natural medicine from the start. It’s clear from the claim of “examining their use and potential risks” that the Associated Press isn’t even looking for potential benefits of natural medicine. They’re just looking to discredit it. And the part about “Ten years and $2.5 billion in research have found no cures” is factually incorrect.

To be more accurate, the statement should have said “Ten years and $2.5 billion in research by pharmaceutical researchers who don’t even know how to study something holistically have found no cures that they are willing to publicly acknowledge.”

Because, in reality, natural medicine has provided the populations of the world with countless cures spanning thousands of years of indigenous use by billions of people. Oh, but wait… the Associated Press doesn’t count that. The only evidence they will consider is “proof” provided by researchers on the payroll of the criminally-operated pharmaceutical industry and rubber-stamped by a corrupt, racketeering U.S. Food and Drug Administration that unquestionably pushes a pro-pharma agenda at the expense of public health.

In one story about alternative medicine, the Associated Press characterized the teaching of acupuncture as “Harry Potter medicine.” The story criticizes acupuncture and demeans any mention of “energy channels” even though acupuncture has been scientifically proven to be extremely effective at managing pain. There is no mention in the AP story of the published, peer-reviewed studies that promote acupuncture’s proven effectiveness and safety.

What happened to just reporting the truth?

…the whole system of “evidence-based medicine” is biased against natural medicine from the start because the FDA maintains an official policy of declaring all plant-based medicines to be inert in the human body, regardless of how much scientific evidence demonstrates otherwise.

In the FDA’s eyes, there is no such thing as a food, herb, dietary supplement or nutrient that has any beneficial effect against any disease or health problem in the human body. And you know why? Because according to the FDA, only “drugs” can be used to prevent, treat or reverse any disease or health condition, not nutrients. All nutrients are inert by decree.

When it comes to health, the Associated Press apparently isn’t interested in reporting what works. It’s not interested in educating the public how to be healthy, how to avoid cancer, or how to explore natural therapies that might support their health rather than destroying it (like chemotherapy does). Instead, the AP has taken the side of the criminally-operated pharmaceutical industry to discredit and destroy anything that offers the American people freedom of choice in their medicines.

the author goes on to say: the AP chooses to attack Suzanne Somers and exposes more of the Awful Press’ Opinions.

(personal note: Psalm 104:14)

How Long Will Our Sun Remain Quiet; We Need Global Warming

by Al Remington

One day, the recession is bad; the next day The Recession is Over – just like that. Is it so simple as saying so through the media and everything is ok now?

Global warming didn’t happen this time either but the media doesn’t know about it yet; the rolls of reporting are reversing. Eventually, maybe they will stop the treason, too.

The “media”; they try hiding the hoax of hoaxes.

How Long Will Our Sun Remain Quiet and Cosmic Rays Increase?

“We don’t have records prior to 1874 that give us details about the sun.
Compared to the past 130 years, our sun now is unprecedented as far as
how slow this Solar Cycle 24 is taking off – or not taking off!”
- David Hathaway, Ph.D., NASA Heliospheric Team Leader

October 30, 2009 Huntsville, Alabama – For twelve years, NASA has had a satellite positioned a million miles in front of Earth with the sun about 92 million miles beyond. Its mission has been to study particles that come near Earth from our sun, the solar system and the galaxy. The satellite is called Advanced Composition Explorer, or ACE, and some of the highly energetic particles ACE has been monitoring are cosmic rays.

Beginning six months ago, ACE satellite data showed a rise in cosmic rays reaching Earth from the Milky Way galaxy. By now, cosmic ray intensity has increased 19% because our sun is so quiet that its reduced magnetic field isn’t deflecting cosmic rays like it has the past few decades. If our sun remains quiet, there could be a 30% increase in cosmic rays reaching Earth in the next year or so – an intensity not seen since 1960. Increased cosmic rays can damage electronic systems and even DNA in living creatures.

Understanding the Peculiar
2008 – 2009 Solar Minimum

The number of days in 2009 without sunspots as of October 29, was 232, or 77% of the time the sun was blank.

Grab a sweater and mittens; th-th-th-there’s m-m-more at the link-bbrrrrrr.

Hatred Inspired Character Assassination

by Tom Remington

Next Page »